Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 04 April 2018
Hits: 1285

Title: Ovarian Neoplasms-Evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Authors: Dr Debashis Deoghuria, Dr Sweta Singh

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.49

Abstract

The present study focuses upon the role of MRI in evaluation of ovarian neoplasm and to compare with clinical, surgical and histopathological data.

References

  1. Ghossain MA, Buy JN, Ligneres C, et al. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: comparison of MR and CT findings. Radiology. 1991; 181:863–70. [PubMed]
  2. Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60:340–8. [PubMed]
  3. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y, et al. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology. 1995; 194:557–65. [PubMed]
  4. Komatsu T, Konishi I, Mandai M, et al. Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure. Radiology. 1996; 198:109–15. [PubMed]
  5. Rieber A, Nussle K, Stohr I, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177:123–9. [PubMed]
  6. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, Pelte MF, Hricak H. Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization—meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology.2005;236:85–94. [PubMed]
  7. Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen PO, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1297–304. [PubMed]
  8. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging–multivariate analysis. Radiology. 2000;214:39–46. [PubMed]
  9. Forstner R, Hricak H, White S. CT and MRI of ovarian cancer (Review) Abdom Imaging. 1995;20:2–8.[PubMed]
  10. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sciot C, et al. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: CT findings and correlation with US. Radiology. 1991;178:811–18. [PubMed]
  11. Troiano RN, Lazzarini KM, Scoutt LM, Lange RC, Flynn SD, McCarthy S. Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology. 1997;204:795–8. [PubMed]
  12. Semelka RC, Lawrence PH, Shoenut JP, et al. Primary ovarian cancer: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and pre-and postcontrast, fat-suppressed MR imaging, with histologic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:99–106. [PubMed]
  13. Prayer L, Kainz C, Kramer J, et al. CT and MR accuracy in the detection of tumor recurrence in patients treated for ovarian cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993;17:626–32. [PubMed]
  14. . Goldhirsch A, Triller JK, Greiner R, Dreher E, Davis BW. Computed tomography prior to second-look opera-tion in advanced ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62:630–4. [PubMed]
  15. Moskovic E, Fernando I, Blake P, Parsons C. Lymphography – current role in oncology. Br J Radiol.1991;64:422–7. [PubMed]
  16. Silverman PM, Osborne M, Dunnick NR, Bandy LC. CT prior to second-look operation in ovarian cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:829–32. [PubMed]
  17. Forstner R, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Frankel SB, Stern JL. Ovarian cancer recurrence: value of MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;196:715–20.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sweta Singh MBBS

Post Graduate Trainee, Bankura Sammilani Medical College and Hospital