Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 04 April 2018
Hits: 1764

Title: Role of NLD Massage with or without Antibiotic Eye Drop in Congenital NLD Obstruction

Authors: Dr Nupur Suman, Dr Anuj Khullar, Piyoosh Verma, Dr Sanjay Verma

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.13

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the success rate of sac massage for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with (laevofloxacin 0.5 %) or without any antibiotics.

Methods: 72 eyes of 65 patients aged 2 to 8 months diagnosed with Congenital nld blockage were included and divided into 2 groups; group 1 included NLD massage with antibiotic eye drops  (laevofloxacin 0.5 %) and group 2 included NLD massage without antibiotic eye drops.  sac massage was done by parent of child and patient was followed up at regular intervals of 15 days each, up to four months. Successful procedure was documented as complete remission of symptoms in subsequent visits following the procedure.

Results: Overall success rate of sac massage was 87 % in group 1 and 62% in group 2.

Conclusion: sac massage immediately after instilling of antibiotic eye drop has higher success rate then only massage.

Keyword: Sac Massage, Nasolacrimal duct, CNLDO, Antibiotic eye drops.

References

  1. Crigler LW. The treatment of congenital dacryocystitis. 1923;81:23–24
  2. Kersten RC. Congenital lacrimal abnorm-alities. In: Bosniak S, editor. Principles and practice of ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol 2. 1st ed.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1995.
  3. Macewen CJ. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Compr Ophthalmol Update. 2006;7:79–87.[PubMed]
  4. Young JD, MacEwen CJ. Managing congenital lacrimal obstruction in general practice. BMJ 1997;315:293-96.
  5. Kapadia MK, Freitag SK, Woog JJ. Evaluation and management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006;39:959-77.
  6. Nelson LB, Calhoun JH, Menduke H. Medical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 1985;92:1187-90.
  7. Paul TO. Medical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J pediatrophthalmol strabismus 1985; 22:68-70.
  8. Yasuhiro Takahashi et al, Management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction duct obstruction,21 July 2009,10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01592
  9. Foster JA, Katowitz JA, Heyman S. Results of dacryoscintigraphy in massage of the congenitally blocked nasolacrimal duct. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 12:32–7. [PubMed]
  10. Honavar SG, Prakash VE, Rao GN. Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:42–8. [PubMed]
  11. Kakizaki H, Takahashi Y, Kinoshita S, Shiraki K, Iwaki M. The rate of symptomatic improvement of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Japanese infants treated with conservative management during the 1st year of age. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ). 2008;2(2):291-294.
  12. MacEwen CJ, Young JD. The fluorescein disappearance test (FDT): an evaluation of its use in infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991a;28:302–5. [PubMed]
  13. MacEwen CJ, Young JD. Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye. 1991b;5:596–600. [PubMed]

Corresponding Author

Dr Sanjay Verma