Title: Intraoperative Findings in Patients of Peptic Ulcer Perforation: A Prospective Study in Correlation with Patient Outcome

Authors: Dr Vinod Yedalwar, Dr Rajeev Kaneria, Dr Atul Kumar Singh, Dr Lalmani Singh

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i3.154

Abstract

Background: Peptic ulcer perforation is an emergency and requires prompt diagnosis and urgent surgical intervention. Overall, peptic ulcer mortality and hospitalization rates have declined for the past two decades, but complications such as peptic ulcer perforation and bleeding remain a substantial health-care problem.

Material and Methods: A prospective 1-year study conducted in 116 cases of peptic perforation admitted in surgical wards of Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Rewa M.P. during the study period June 2016-May 2017.All patients suspected of peptic perforation were admitted to surgery ward and underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy. Post-operatively H. pylori serological test to detect IgG antibody was done with patients blood serum. Their findings were recorded in a proforma and master chart. The information obtained was tabulated and analyzed.

Results: Incidence of peptic perforation was 116 (1.20%) cases of all surgical admissions,  Most common site of peptic perforation was anterior wall of first part of duodenum in 61 (55.4%) cases, omentopexy was most common procedure done i.e. in 106 (91.37%) cases,  overall Mortality was 15 (12.93%) cases.

Conclusion: Perforated peptic ulcer is a disease of middle aged adults. Delay in hospitalization due to initial treatment by homemade medicines and non availability of essential surgical care further complicates the perforation in this region.

Perforation is diagnosed on clinical grounds immediately as patient reaches emergency department yet due to delayed hospitalization, time lost in resuscitation of the patient affects the outcome of standard surgical procedure. Selection of appropriate surgical procedure and postoperative care is helpful in early and uneventful recovery. Post operative H. pylori eradication therapy follow up endoscopic facilities in patients found positive for H. pylori can reduce recurrence rates and subsequently the burden of this disease.

Keywords: Peptic ulcer perforation, intraoperative findings, Outcome.

References

  1. Nuhu A, Madziga AG, Gali BM. Acute perforated duodenal ulcer in Maiduguri. Internet J Surg. 2009;21:1.
  2. Testini M, Portincasa P, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Pellegrini F, Greco L. Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2338-40.
  3. Syanes C, Lie RT, Syanes K, Kie SA, Soreide O. Adverse effects of delayed treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 1994;220(2):168-75.
  4. Hill AG. The management of perforated peptic ulcer in a resource poor environment. East Afr Med J. 2001;78 (8):346-8.
  5. Dakubo JC, Naaeder SB, Clegg-Lamptey JN. Gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer perforation. East Afr Med J. 2009; 86(3):100–9.
  6. Munikrishna PC, Bojegowda K. A retrospective study on duodenal ulcer perforation and outcome. J. Evid. Based Med. Healthc. 2016; 3(18), 718-722.
  7. Al-Marsoumi AM, Jabbo NS. Risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer disease: Incidence and relation to morbidity and mortality. Mustansiriya Med J 2013;12:35-44.
  8. Zittel TT, Jehle EC, Becker HD: Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today: indication, technique and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000;385:84–96.
  9. Kevin GB, and Anthony EY. Peptic ulcer. In: ‘The New Aird’s Companion in Surgical Studies, 2nd Ed. London: Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Nottingham Court Road 1988: 771-72.
  10. Chaudhary A, Bose SM, Gupta NM, Wig JD, Khanna SK. Giant Perforations of Duodenal Ulcer. Ind J Gastroenterol 1991;10:14–5.
  11. Chalya P, Mabula JB, Koy M, Mchembe MD, Jaka HM, Kabangila R, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers in Northwestern Tanzania: A tertiary hospital experience, World J EmergSurg 2011;6:31.
  12. Goud VS, Babu NV, Kumar PB. Comparative Study of Closure of Duodenal Perforations with Omental Plugging Versus Graham’s Patch. Int J Sci Stud 2016;4(8):138-142.

Corresponding Author

Dr Rajeev Kaneria

Address: 186, Sai Kripa Colony, Indore (M.P.) India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Phone Number: 7000046849