Title: Bacteriological Profile of Urinary Tract Infections in General Medicine Ward in a Tertiary Care Hospital and its Antibiotic Sensitivity

Authors: Ananta Kumar Datta, Sattik Siddhanta, Rajeev Ranjan

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i3.152

Abstract

Urinary tract infections(UTI) is the most common bacterial infection prevalent in both males and females and contribute to second most common nosocomial infection raising the hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. Urethral catheters serve as a niche for proliferation and multiplication of bacteria and biofilm produced by them provide resistance to antimicrobials and they spread elsewhere. This cross sectional study was conducted among 1008 adult patients admitted to general medicine ward in Kolkata. The age of patients ranged from 14 to 102 years. Our study revealed that among the 1008 patients, the prevalence rate of UTI was 23.4 percent. Among total uropathogens isolated Escherichia coli was most prevalent in both sex and all age groups independent of risk factors, followed by Klebsiella, Enterobacter and Citrobacter .Gram negative organisms  were 87.7% and Gram positives were 12.29%. The antibiotics sensitive to gram negative organisms were Imipenem (20.3%), Piperacillin-Tazobactum (12.8%), Amikacin (12.6%), Polymyxin (10.4%) and Nitrofurantoin(8%). Gram positive organisms showed maximum sensitivity to Vancomycin (25.24%), followed by Linezolid (21.3%) and Teicoplanin (21.3%). Although the results show the development of UTI does not rely solely on health professionals’ practices, the authors conclude these professionals can have an important role in the prevention of UTI reducing the number of risk factors.

Keywords: Bacteria, catheterization, Escherichia coli, urinary tract infection, antibiotics.

References

  1. Naeem Akhtar., 2000. Urinary tract bacterial pathogens; their antimicrobial Susceptibility patterns at  The Professional, 7(2):131-137.
  2. Nadia Gul, Talat Y. Mujahid And Samia Ahmad, Isolation,Identification And Antibiotic Resistance Profile Of Indigenous Bacterial Isolates From Urinary Tract Infection Patients; Pakistan Journal Of Biological Sciences 7(12); 2051-2054, 2004; ISSN 1028-8880.
  3. CDC January 2015; Urinary Tract Infection (Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [CAUTI] and Non-Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [UTI]) and Other Urinary System Infection [USI]) Events.
  4. Savitha, T., International Journal of Current Research 2, Issue, 1, pp. 067- 072, January, 2011
  5. Higgins, C., 1995. Microbial examination of urine in urinary tract infection. Nurs – Times. 91(11); 32-35.
  6. Acharya, VN, 1992. Urinary Tract infection – a dangerous & unrecognized foreunder of systemic sepsis. J. Post Grad Med., 38: 52-54. 4.
  7. Sklar, A H, Caruana , R J, Lammers, J E. and Strauser, G O., 1987. Renal infections in Autosomal polycystic  kidney diseases. Am. J.Kidney Dis., 10: 81-88.3.
  8. Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;17(4):299-303.
  9. Weinstein JW, Mazon D, Pantelick E, Reagan-Cirincione P, Dembry LM, Hierholzer WJ,Jr. A decade of prevalence surveys in a tertiary-care center: Trends in nosocomial infection rates, device utilization, and patient acuity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(8):543-548.
  10. Munasinghe RL, Yazdani H, Siddique M, Hafeez W. Appropriateness of use of indwelling urinary catheters in patients admitted to the medical service. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22(10):647-649.
  11. Jain P, Parada JP, David A, Smith LG. Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(13):1425-1429.
  12. Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK, et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med. 2000;109(6):476-480.
  13. Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, Rosner B. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(11):637-642.
  14. Givens CD, Wenzel RP. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in surgical patients: A controlled study on the excess morbidity and costs. J Urol. 1980;124(5):646-648.
  15. Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(1):27-31.

Corresponding Author

Sattik Siddhanta

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.