Title: A Topical Cream Containing Niacinamide 4% and Gluconolactone 14% Modifies the Local C. Acnes Population in Patients with almost no or Mild Facial Acne

Authors: B. Dréno, A. Khammari, S. Corvec

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i3.84

Abstract

Background: C. acnes is involved in acne.

Aim: To assess the evolution of C. acnes phylotypes,the antimicrobial activity, the risk for inducing antibiotic resistance emergence and the clinical efficacy of a cream containing niacinamide and gluconolactone.

Methods: Prospective, open-label, non-comparative study performed in 21 adult patients with almost no or mild facial acne according to the GEA score.

The main evaluation criterion was the genomic analysis of C. acnes phylotypes, using standard methods and clinical assessments made at baseline and Day56. Adverse events were reported throughout the study.

Results: At baseline, the mean age was 23.5±5.5 years, 85.7% of the patients were female, main C. acnes phylotype was IA1 (71.4%). A C. acnes strain, resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin, potentially due to a mutation at position A2059G, was observed in two patients. The mean number of inflammatory lesions was 13.1±3.6 and the number of open or closed come dones was 20.2±5.4. At Day 56, a shift to a different C. acnes phylotype was observed in eight patients; in seven patients phylotypes remained unchanged. C. granulosum was still present in one patient, while no resistance or intermediate sensitivity was observed anymore. In one patient, RNA mutation 16S was absent, despite an intermediate susceptibility to tetracycline. The cream caused no antibiotic resistance emergence. Inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count and global severity had significantly improved from baseline; safety was excellent.

Conclusion: The tested cream improves acne by modifying C. acnes phylotypes, thus changing the C. acnes population, without causing antibiotic resistance emergence.

Keywords: Acne, C. acnes phylotypes, gluconolactone, niacinamide, antibiotic resistance, inflammatory lesions, microbiota.

References

  1. Szabo K, Erdei L, Bolla BS, Tax G, Biro T, Kemeny L. Factors shaping the composition of the cutaneous microbiota. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):344-351. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14967.
  2. Di Domizio J, Pagnoni A, Huber M, Hohl D, Gilliet M. [The skin microbiota: a colossus steps into the spotlight]. Rev Med Suisse. 2016;12(512):660-4.
  3. Grice EA, Kong HH, Renaud G, Young AC, Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, et al. A diversity profile of the human skin microbiota.Genome Res. 2008 Jul;18(7): 1043-50. doi: 10.1101/gr.075549.107.
  4. Scholz CF, Jensen A, Lomholt HB, Bruggemann H, Kilian M. A novel high-resolution single locus sequence typing scheme for mixed populations of Propionibacterium acnes in vivo. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104199. eCollection 2014.
  5. McDowell A, Nagy I, Magyari M, Barnard E, Patrick S. The opportunistic pathogen Propionibacterium acnes: insights into typing, human disease, clonal diversifi-cation and CAMP factor evolution. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 13;8(9):e70897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070897. eCollection 2013.
  6. Fitz-Gibbon S, Tomida S, Chiu BH, Nguyen L, Du C, Liu M, Elashoff D,et al. Propionibacterium acnes strain populations in the human skin microbiome associated with acne.J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Sep;133(9):2152-60. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.21.
  7. Paugam C, Corvec S, Saint-Jean M, Le Moigne M, Khammari A, Boisrobert A, Nguyen JM, et al. Propionibacterium acnes phylotypes and acne severity: an observational prospective study.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(9): e398-e9. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14206.
  8. Nagy I, Pivarcsi A, Koreck A, Szell M, Urban E, Kemeny L. Distinct strains of Propionibacterium acnes induce selective human beta-defensin-2 and interleukin-8 expression in human keratinocytes through toll-like receptors. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124(5):931-8.
  9. Jasson F, Nagy I, Knol AC, Zuliani T, Khammari A, Dreno B. Different strains of Propionibacterium acnes modulate differently the cutaneous innate immunity. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22(9):587-92. doi: 10.1111/exd.12206.
  10. Furukawa A, Uchida K, Ishige Y, Ishige I, Kobayashi I, Takemura T, Yokoyama T, et al. Characterization of Propionibacterium acnes isolates from sarcoid and non-sarcoid tissues with special reference to cell invasiveness, serotype, and trigger factor gene polymorphism. Microb Pathog. 2009;46(2):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.10.013.
  11. Dreno B. What is new in the pathophysiology of acne, an overview. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31 Suppl 5:8-12.doi: 10.1111/jdv.14374. Review.
  12. Schafer F, Fich F, Lam M, Garate C, Wozniak A, Garcia P. Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic characteristics of Propionibacterium acnes isolated from patients with acne. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(4):418-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05371.x.
  13. Chen AC, Damian DL. Nicotinamide and the skin. Australas J Dermatol. 2014;55(3): 169-75. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12163.
  14. Decker A, Graber EM. Over-the-counter Acne Treatments: A Review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2012;5(5):32-40.
  15. Khodaeiani E, Fouladi RF, Amirnia M, Saeidi M, Karimi ER. Topical 4% nicotinamide vs. 1% clindamycin in moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(8):999-1004. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12002.
  16. Dreno B, Poli F, Pawin H, Beylot C, Faure M, Chivot M, et al. Development and evaluation of a Global Acne Severity Scale (GEA Scale) suitable for France and Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(1):43-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03685.x.
  17. Furustrand Tafin U, Aubin GG, Eich G, Trampuz A, Corvec S. Occurrence and new mutations involved in rifampicin-resistant Propionibacterium acnes strains isolated from biofilm or device-related infections. 2015;34:116-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.05.003.
  18. Barnard E, Nagy I, Hunyadkurti J, Patrick S, McDowell A. Multiplex touchdown PCR for rapid typing of the opportunistic pathogen Propionibacterium acnes. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(4):1149-55. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02460-14.
  19. Kilian M, Scholz CF, Lomholt HB. Multilocus sequence typing and phyloge-netic analysis of Propionibacterium acnes. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1158-65. doi: 10.1128/JCM.r06129-11.
  20. Oprica C, Lofmark S, Lund B, Edlund C, Emtestam L, Nord CE. Genetic basis of resistance in Propionibacterium acnes strains isolated from diverse types of infection in different European countries. 2005;11(3):137-43.
  21. Sadhasivam S, Sinha M, Saini S, Kaur SP, Gupta T, Sengupta S, Ghosh Set al. Heterogeneity and antibiotic resistance in Propionibacterium acnes isolates and its therapeutic implications: blurring the lines between commensal and pathogenic phylotypes. Dermatol Ther. 2016;29(6):451-4. doi: 10.1111/dth.12391.
  22. Chen CY, Chi KH, Pillay A, Nachamkin E, Su JR, Ballard RC. Detection of the A2058G and A2059G 23S rRNA gene point mutations associated with azithromycin resistance in Treponema pallidum by use of a TaqMan real-time multiplex PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(3):908-13. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02770-12.
  23. Nakase K, Nakaminami H, Takenaka Y, Hayashi N, Kawashima M, Noguchi N. Relationship between the severity of acne vulgaris and antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from acne lesions in a hospital in Japan. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(Pt 5):721-8. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.067611-0.

Corresponding Author

Brigitte Dréno

UF dermato-cancérologie, CHU Nantes-Hôtel-dieu, Inserm U1232,

CIC Biothérapie Inserm 05031 Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes cedex 01, France

Phone. 00332 40 08 32 80, Fax. 00332 40 08 31 17, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.