Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 01 January 2018
Hits: 1690

Title: Evaluation of vaginal cytology through clue cell detection and Nugent’s score in the laboratory diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in women of reproductive age

Authors: Musumba Cleophas Obonyo, Paul M Kosiyo, Kyama Mutinda, Evans Rabala

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i1.108

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of various causes of vaginal discharge is done by detailed history taking, physical examination and laboratory investigations.  Use Nugent’s score as laboratory tests remains the gold standard however, its use presents challenges in resource limited set ups.  Bacterial vaginosis (BV) result from supplanted Lactobacillus species leading to disruption in the normal vaginal microbiome. 

Objective: The main aim of the study was to evaluate vaginal cytology through clue cell detection and Nugent’s score in the laboratory diagnosis of BV in women of reproductive age. Specifically, the study determined the association between vaginal pH and the quantity of clue cells in BV, and the correlation between vaginal pH and polymorphonuclear cell in BV among non-pregnant women of reproductive age residents this Kisumu County. 

Methodology: The study was done at Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital in 238 female participants aged (15-49yrs) presenting with vaginal discharge at Family Planning and Out Patient Department clinics.  Clinical examination was done and laboratory specimens were collected to investigate the causative pathogens of vaginal discharge.  Nugent’s score was performed to detect bacterial morphotypes and clue cell in BV using one swab while the other swab was used for high vaginal swab examination was performed using wet mount technique.

Results: Results revealed positive correlation between clue cells and vaginal pH (ῥ=0.597, P<0.001).  At the same time women without BV [mean (SEM), 4.32 (± 0.05)] had significantly low vaginal pH relative to those with BV [mean (SEM), 4.90, (± 0.05)], P<0.001. Moreover there was, positive correlation between vaginal pH and PMNs (ῥ=0.271, P<0.001).

Conclusion:  Clue cell detection and vaginal pH are the most useful criteria in the diagnosis of BV among symptomatic patients in resource limited settings as confirmed by the determined associations. However, PMNs should not be considered a criterion in diagnosis of BV even if it correlates well with vaginal pH.

Keywords: Bacterial vaginosis, Nugent’s score, pH, Gram stain, Normal flora

References

  1. Klebanoff MA, Andrews WW, Yu KF, Brotman RM, Nansel TR, Zhang J, Cliver SP, Schwebke JR: A pilot study of vaginal flora changes with randomization to cessation of douching. Sex Transm Dis 2006, 33(10):610-613.
  2. Morris M, Nicoll A, Simms I, Wilson J, Catchpole M: Bacterial vaginosis: a public health review. BJOG 2001, 108(5):439-450.
  3. Thurman AR, Kimble T, Herold B, Mesquita PM, Fichorova RN, Dawood HY, Fashemi T, Chandra N, Rabe L, Cunningham TD et al: Bacterial Vaginosis and Subclinical Markers of Genital Tract Inflammation and Mucosal Immunity. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2015, 31(11):1139-1152.
  4. Demba E, Morison L, van der Loeff MS, Awasana AA, Gooding E, Bailey R, Mayaud P, West B: Bacterial vaginosis, vaginal flora patterns and vaginal hygiene practices in patients presenting with vaginal discharge syndrome in The Gambia, West Africa. BMC Infect Dis 2005, 5:12.
  5. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL: Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991, 29(2):297-301.
  6. Schmidt H, Hansen JG: Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by wet mount identification of bacterial morphotypes in vaginal fluid. Int J STD AIDS 2000, 11(3):150-155.
  7. Eschenbach DA, Hillier S, Critchlow C, Stevens C, DeRouen T, Holmes KK: Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988, 158(4):819-828.
  8. Alcaide ML, Chisembele M, Malupande E, Arheart K, Fischl M, Jones DL: A cross-sectional study of bacterial vaginosis, intravaginal practices and HIV genital shedding; implications for HIV transmission and women's health. BMJ Open 2015, 5(11):e009036.
  9. Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW: Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104(2):267-272.
  10. Coleman JS, Hitti J, Bukusi EA, Mwachari C, Muliro A, Nguti R, Gausman R, Jensen S, Patton D, Lockhart D et al: Infectious correlates of HIV-1 shedding in the female upper and lower genital tracts. AIDS 2007, 21(6):755-759.
  11. Cohen CR, Lingappa JR, Baeten JM, Ngayo MO, Spiegel CA, Hong T, Donnell D, Celum C, Kapiga S, Delany S et al: Bacterial vaginosis associated with increased risk of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission: a prospective cohort analysis among African couples. PLoS Med 2012, 9(6):e1001251.
  12. Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Oakley BB, Marrazzo JM: Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2007, 45(10):3270-3276.
  13. Patel V, Pednekar S, Weiss H, Rodrigues M, Barros P, Nayak B, Tanksale V, West B, Nevrekar P, Kirkwood BR et al: Why do women complain of vaginal discharge? A population survey of infectious and pyschosocial risk factors in a South Asian community. Int J Epidemiol 2005, 34(4):853-862.
  14. Riggs MA, Klebanoff MA: Treatment of vaginal infections to prevent preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004, 47(4):796-807; discussion 881-792.
  15. Jespers V, Crucitti T, Menten J, Verhelst R, Mwaura M, Mandaliya K, Ndayisaba GF, Delany-Moretlwe S, Verstraelen H, Hardy L et al: Prevalence and correlates of bacterial vaginosis in different sub-populations of women in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2014, 9(10):e109670.
  16. KNBS: Kenya Population and Housing Census (10 Per Cent sample, every 10th household), Population and Housing Census. 2009.
  17. Amsel R, Totten PR, C.A S: Nonspecific Vginitis. Diagnostic Criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. The American  Journal of Medicine 1983, 74:14-22.
  18. Sha BE, Chen HY, Wang QJ, Zariffard MR, Cohen MH, Spear GT: Utility of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and quantitative PCR for Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Lactobacillus spp. for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43(9):4607-4612.
  19. Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V, Ladhoff A, Swidsinski S, Hale LP, Lochs H: Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 106(5 Pt 1):1013-1023.
  20. Thomason JL, Gelbart SM, Monagle LM, James JA, Broekhuizen FF: Is pH test paper as accurate as the electronic measurement of the pH of vaginal secretions? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990, 162(5):1213-1214.
  21. Thulkar J, Kriplani A, Agarwal N: Utility of pH test & Whiff test in syndromic approach of abnormal vaginal discharge. Indian J Med Res 2010, 131:445-448.
  22. Thulkar J, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, Vishnubhatla S: Aetiology & risk factors of recurrent vaginitis & its association with various contraceptive methods. Indian J Med Res 2010, 131:83-87.
  23. Gardner HL, Dukes CD: Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis: a newly defined specific infection previously classified non-specific vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1955, 69(5):962-976.
  24. Posner SF, Kerimova J, Aliyeva F, Duerr A: Strategies for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a resource-poor setting. Int J STD AIDS 2005, 16(1):52-55.

Corresponding Author

Musumba Cleophas Obonyo

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Cell number +254720644513