Title: Comparison between Combination of Spinal and General Anesthesia with Plain General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynaecological Surgeries

Authors: Dr Sarita Phulkar, Dr Hemant Pawar, Dr Jyotsna Mali

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i12.75

Abstract

Aim and Objective: The present study was undertaken to compare the combination of spinal (SA) and general anesthesia (GA) with plain general anesthesia (GA) in terms of heamodynamic parameters, requirement of rescue analgesia and incidence of post–operative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Methods: In this study, 100 female patients of ASA grade I or II, having age between 20 to 60 years were randomly divided into two groups of 50 patients in each group. Group A received GA and group B received SA with GA. In group A induction of anaesthesia was done with propofol 2mg/kg and vecuronium bromide 0.1mg/kg while in group B induction was done with 15-18 mg of heavy bupivacaine hydrochloride. In both the groups, heamodynamic parameters (HR, SBP and DBP) and SPO2 were recorded and requirement of rescue analgesia were noted. Patients were monitored for any evidence of complications or adverse events.

Results: The heamodynamic parameters and VAS values were relatively lower in group B than group A and difference was found to be statistically significant (p< 0.05). Hence, the requirement of rescue analgesia was less in group B than group A. Group A had 70% of patients with PONV as compared to 28% in group B.

Conclusions: The combination of spinal and general anesthesia provided more stable hemodynamic profile with better postoperative pain control and less PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries.

Keywords: Spinal anesthesia, General anesthesia, Heamodynamics, Propofol, Vecuronium bromide, Bupivacaine hydrochloride.

References

  1. Jadhav PP, Kamble R, Kolekar AD and Supe AN. Spinal anaesthesia for general laparoscopic surgery. ejbps 2016;3(8):371-375.
  2. Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-Khouri SI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: A review.J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:67–78.
  3. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Kashfi A, Kraus T,et al. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg 2004;21:95-105.
  4. Zuckerman RS, Heneghan S. The duration of hemodynamic depression during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1233-6.
  5. Jean LJ. Anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. In: Miller RD, editor Anesthesia, 7th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 2185-202. Sinha R, Gurwara AK, Gupta SC. Laparoscopic surgery using spinal anesthesia. JSLS 2008;12:133-8.
  6. Vaghadia H, Viskari D, Mitchell GW. Selective spinal anesthesia for out patient laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:256-60.
  7. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of post operative mortality and morbidity with epidural and spinal anesthesia: Results from overview of randomized trials. BMJ 2000;321:1493.
  8. Vaghadia H, Mc Leod DH, Mitcheel GW. Small dose of hypobaric lidocaine and Fentanyl for outpatients laparoscopy. Anesthesia Analg 1997;85:59.
  9. Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa and Ashish Kulshrestha. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: General vs regional anaesthesia. J Minim Access Surg. 2016; 12(1): 4–9.
  10. Lehtinen AM, Laatikainen T, Koskimies AI, Hovorka J. Modifying effects of epidural analgesia or general anesthesia on stress hormone response to laparoscopy for in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1987;4:23-9.
  11. Rigg JR. Does regional block improve outcome after surgery? Anaesth Intensive Care 1991;19:404-11.
  12. Yokoyama M, Ohta Y, Hirakawa M, TSuge H. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under different anesthesia methods. Masui 1996;45:160-6.
  13. O’Malley C, Cunningham AJ. Physiological changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2001;19:1-19.
  14. Korhonena M, Valanne JV, Jokela RM, Ravaska P, Korttila KT. A comparison of selective spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and general anesthesia with desflurane for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2004;99: 1668–73.
  15. Hanning CD. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Br J Anaesth 2005;95: 82–7.
  16. Ghodki PS, Sardesai SP, Naphade RW. Combined spinal and general anesthesia is better than general anesthesia alone for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Saudi J Anaesth 2014;8:498-503.
  17. Johannsen G, Anderson M, Juhl B. The effect of general anesthesia on the haemodynamics events during laparoscopy with CO2 on sufflation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989;33:132.
  18. Newton DE. Awareness in anesthesia. In: Atkinson RS, Adam P, Editors, Recent advances in anesthesia and analgesia, No.18. New York; Churchill Livingstone; 1994; 39-58.
  19. Wong J, Song D, Blanshard H, Grady D, Chung F. Titration of isoflurane using BIS index improves early recovery of elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries. Can J Anesth 2002;49:13-8.
  20. Malins AF, Field JM, Nesling PM, Cooper GM. Nausea and vomiting after Ondansetron, metoclopromide and placebo. Br J Anaesth 1994;72:231-3.
  21. Fisburne JI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: Considerations, complications and techniques. J Reprod Med 1978;21:37-40.

Corresponding Author

Dr Hemant Pawar

Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Adgaon, Nashik Pin 422003