Title: A Comparative Study between Pure Tone Audiometry and Impedance Audiometry Findings in Patients with Chronic Retracted Tympanic Membranes

Authors: Priyank D. Talati, Kalpana Rajiv Kumar, Paulastya Ghosh

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.205

Abstract

Chronic cases of retracted tympanic membranes are common conditions which present to the ENT OPD. They are due to a variety of middle ear pathologies and present with decreased hearing in a majority of cases. Pure tone audiometry and tympanometry are the two most common types of audiological evaluations performed in an ENT OPD. They can predict the ossicular chain status and the status of the middle ear as a result of their interpretations. In this study done on 25 patients with chronic retracted tympanic membranes, we established a statistically significant correlation between Grade of Retraction and hearing loss (p= 0.0389) and between tympanometry and pure tone audiometry (p=0.000402).

Keywords: Pure tone audiometry, Tympanometry, Retracted Tympanic Membrane.

References

  1. Sadé, J; Berco E (1976). "Atelectasis and secretory otitis media". Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 85 (2 Suppl 25 Pt 2): 66–72
  2. Tos, M; Poulsen G (1980). "Attic retractions following secretory otitis". Acta Otolaryngol. 89 (5-6): 479–86
  3. Borgstein, J; Gerritsma TV; Wieringa MH; Bruce IA (2007). "The Erasmus atelectasis classification: proposal of a new classific-ation for atelectasis of the middle ear in children". Laryngoscope. 117 (7): 1255–9
  4. James AL, Papsin BC, Trimble K, Ramsden J, Sanjeevan N, Bailie N, Chadha NK (May 2012). "Tympanic membrane retraction: An endoscopic evaluation of staging systems". Laryngoscope. 122 (5): 1115–20.
  5. MRC Multi-Centre Otitis Media Study Group (May 2001) Otol. Neurotol. 22 (3): 291–8.
  6. Elzouki, Abdelaziz Y (2012). Textbook of clinical pediatrics (2 ed.). Berlin: Springer. p. 602.
  7. David Jay Steele; Jeffrey Susman; Fredrick A. McCurdy (2003). Student guide to primary care: making the most of your early clinical experience. Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 370.
  8. Onusko E, Tympanometry, Am Fam Physician. 2004 Nov 1;70(9):1713-1720.
  9. Zheng W, Smith JD, Shi B, Li Y, Wang Y, Li S, Meng Z, Zheng Q. The natural history of audiologic and tympanometric findings in patients with an unrepaired cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009; 46:24–29.
  10. Sowbhagya, Malligere&Shivhare, Peeyush & Yadav, Monu& Sushma, Pulivarthi& Kumar, Praveen & Lata, S &Shastry, Savitha. (2016). Audiometric and Tympa-nometric Assessment in Patients with Oral Submucous Fibrosis. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research. 13. 1-7. 10.9734/BJMMR/2016/23615.
  11. McCandless G, Thomas G: Impedance audiometry as a screening procedure for middle-ear disease. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1974; 78:98-102.
  12. Brooks DN: Hearing screening: A comparative study ofan impedance method and pure tone screening. ScandAudiol 1973; 2:67-72.
  13. Fay TH, Hockberg I, et al: Audiologic and otologic screening of disadvantaged children. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 91:366- 370.
  14. Eagles E, Wishik S, Doerfler L: Hearing sensitivity and ear disease in children: A prospective study. Laryngoscope 1967; (suppl):1-274.
  15. Osborn CD: Air-bone gap measurement in identification audiometry. MaicoAudiol Lib Ser 2:1975.

Corresponding Author

Priyank D. Talati

702, Himanshu Mandar, Opposite Surya Hospital,

Lallubhai Park Road Extension, Vile Parle (W),

Mumbai-400056