Title: Morphological Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Volume in Gender Differentiation

Authors: Hassan Mohammad, Anand A.M, Dr N. Kulasekaran

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.204

Abstract

Background: The maxillary sinuses are the largest of the facial cavities. Depending on the individual’s age, its volume varies. between small, average or large sinuses. Communication of this sinus with the nasal fossa is through a canal called the ostium which has its opening at the nasofrontalis duct. The high placement of this canal favors the origin of several sinus pathologies. The aim of this study is to calculate the maxillary sinus volume by measuring the Antero-posterior, Medio-lateral and Cranio-caudal distances of the maxillary sinus andto compare the morphology of maxillary sinus between the right and the left sides in males and females. Additionally the location of maxillary ostium was also assessed.

Materials and Methods: Our study involved 80 adults who were referred to the department of radiodiagnosis for complaints related to paranasal sinuses. Computed tomography (CT) images of paranasal sinus anatomy was obtained in coronal and sagittal planes. Measurements of the maximum cranio-caudal, transverse and anteroposterior diameters were measured. The opening of the sinus ostium (upper, middle, or lower third) was obtained.

Results: In our study, the average maxillary sinus volume on the right side was found to be 40.7% more in the male population as compared to the females whereas on the left side, it was found to be 50.3%. This suggests that the maxillary volume can be used as a relatively accurate method to determine the gender. Of the 100 adults, maxillary ostium was located in the upper 1/3rd in 84, and in the middle 1/3rd in 16. None of the adults had a lower 1/3rd opening of the maxillary ostium.

Conclusion: Significant difference exist in the maxillary volume between males and females, with the left maxillary sinus showing a more greater difference. The maxillary ostium is situated in the upper 1/3rd majority of patients. CT of paranasal sinuses is a useful in assessing these observations.

References

  1. Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, et al. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 547‑60.
  2. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: Anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology – Eleven years of surgical experience (1979‑1990). J Oral Implantol1990;16:199‑209.
  3. Hamdy RM, Abdel‑Wahed N. Three dimensional linear and volumetric analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization. J Adv Res 2014;5:387‑95.
  4. Kumar H, Choudhry R, Kakar S. Accessory maxillary Ostia: Topography and clinical application. J AnatSoc India 2001;50:3‑5.
  5. Hollinshed WH, Rosse C. Text Book of Anatomy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Herper and Row; 1985. p. 976‑85.
  6. van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:256‑65.
  7. Cordioli G, Mazzocco C, Schepers E, Brugnolo E, Majzoub Z. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:270‑8.
  8. Karakas S, Kavakli A. Morphometric examination of the paranasal sinuses and mastoid air cells using computed tomogr-aphy. Ann Saudi Med 2005;25:41‑5.
  9. Miller AJ, Amedee RG. Functional anatomy of the paranasal sinuses. J La State Med Soc1997;149:85‑90.
  10. Amedee R. Sinus anatomy and function. In: Bailey BJ, editor. Head and Neck Surgery Otolaryngology. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1993. p. 342‑9.
  11. Uthman AT, Al‑Rawi NH, Al‑Naaimi AS, Al‑Timimi JF. Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination using helical CT scanning. J Forensic Sci 2011;56:403‑8.
  12. Hamdy, R. and Abdel-Wahed, N. (2014). Three-dimensional linear and volumetric analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization. Journal of Advanced Research, 5(3), pp.387-395
  13. S. Tiwana, G.M. Kushner, R.H. Haug, Maxillary sinus augmentation, Dent Clin North Am, 50 (2006), pp. 409-424
  14. M. Shahbazian, D. Xue, Y. Hu, J. Cleynenbreuge, R. Jacobs Spiral computed tomography based maxillary sinus imaging in relation to tooth loss, implant placement and potential grafting procedure, J Oral Maxillofac Res, 1 (1) (2010), p. e7, 10.5037/jomr.2010.1107.

Corresponding Author

Hassan Mohammad

SMVMCH