Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 11 November 2017
Hits: 1107

Title: A Comparative Analysis between Laparoscopic and Open Appendicectomy in A Rural Medical College Hospital

Authors: Dr T.Henry Prabakaran, Dr Sendhil Sengodan, Dr S.Senthil Kumar, V.Vaishali, T.Vimal Raj

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.193

Abstract

Background: Appendicectomy is the most commonly performed procedure in emergency & elective surgery these days. It is done by both open and laparoscopic methods. Previously laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed only in corporate hospitals & cities. Nowadays it is practised even in rural areas. In this cross-sectional prospective study, we aim to compare both methods of appendicectomy which was performed in a rural Medical College Hospital – IRT Perundurai Medical College & Hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study of 88 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic (LA) (n=77) and open (n=11) appendectomy (OA) in a period of ten months from OCT 2016 to JULY 2017 was done. A comparative analysis was done between the two groups on the basis of clinical examination, ultrasound findings, operative time, intra-operative findings, pain score, , resumption of normal diet, duration of hospital stay and post-operative complications.

Results: Mean age of patients was 39.5 years in the laparoscopic and 40 years in the open group. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was associated with a lesser incidence of wound infection, shorter hospital stay and earlier return to regular diet & normal activities. However the operative time depends on the surgeon’s experience which is longer compared to open appendicectomy.

Conclusion: The laparoscopic technique is a safe and clinically beneficial operative procedure. It provides certain advantages over open appendectomy, including short hospital stay, decreased requirement of postoperative analgesia, early food tolerance, and earlier return to normal activities. Where feasible, laparoscopy should be undertaken as the initial procedure of choice for most cases of suspected appendicitis.

Keywords: Laparoscopic appendectomy, Open appendicectomy, appendicitis.

References

  1. Michele Pisano,. Luca Ansaloni, in Microbiology for surgical infections,book Edition 2014.
  2. Christine Hsu, Stephen john ferzoco, in encyclopedia of gastroenterology, book, Edition 2004.
  3. Ukai T, Shikata S, Takeda H et al. Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time : from a cumulative meta-analyses of laparoscopic versus open appendecomt for acute appendicitis. BMC gastroenterology 2016; 16:37
  4. Taguchi Y, Komatsu S, Sakamato E, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:1705-12.
  5. Thomson JE, Kruger D, Jann-Kruger C et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety. Srg Endosc 2015; 29:2027- 32.
  6. Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16:37.
  7. Antonio Biondi, Carla Di Stefano, Francesco Ferrara et al, World Journal of emergency Surgery 2016 ,11:44
  8. Hannu lintula, Hannu kokki, kari vanima et all. Arch pediatr adolese med 2004 colon 158(1):34 -37.
  9. Vilos GA, et al. J Obstet Gynaecolo Can 2017. Laparoscopic entry : A reiview of techniques, technologies & complications.
  10. Bianchi G et Al. Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Laparoscopic access review- is there a safest entry method?
  11. Van Bree Sh, et al. Ann Surg. 2014 Identification of clinical outcome measures for recovery of GI motility in post-operative cases.
  12. Kilpatrick CC, Orejuela FJ. Management of acute abdomen in pregnancy. A review. Curr opin obstet Gynaecol. 2008 : 20 (6) : 534-539.
  13. Cox MR, Mc Call JL toouli J et al, Prospective randomised comparing of open vs laparascopic appendicectomy in men. World J surg. 1996:20:236-6
  14. Temple LK , Litwin DE, Mcleod RS. Meta analysis of laparascopic vs open appendicectomy in patient suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J surg.1999. 42:377-83.
  15. Vallina VL Velasco JM, McCulloch CS . Laparscopic vs conventional appendice-ctomy. Ann surg 1993;218:685-92
  16. Xiaohang Li, Jialin Zhang, Lixuan Sang, et al. Laparascopic vs conventional appendicectomy meta analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMC gastro enterology 2010 10-129
  17. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439–448.
  18. Tate JJ, Chung SC, Dawson J, et al. Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:761–764.
  19. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc.1998;12:1204–8 
  20. Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999;9:17–26 .
  21. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open append-icectomy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:48–53.
  22. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B.Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. A prospe-ctive, randomized comparison of laparos-copic appendectomy with open appende-ctomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169:208–13 
  23. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic vs conven-tional appendectomy-a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:289–295 
  24. McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins T, Helton WS. A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg.1996;171:533–537 
  25. Tate JJ. Laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1169–70
  26. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendec-tomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43–52 
  27. Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Rønning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S.Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.Br J Surg. 2001;88:200–205
  28. Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M. A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1023–1028 
  29. Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92:298–304
  30. Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc.2004;18:334–7
  31. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.Ann Surg. 1994;219:725–8
  32. Yong JL, Law WL, Lo CY, Lam CM. A comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. JSLS.  2006;10:188–92
  33. Marzouk M, Khater M, Elsadek M, Abdelmoghny A. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study of 227 patients. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:721–724
  34. Utpal De. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: An Indian perspective. JMAS. 2005;1:15–20.

Corresponding Author

Dr T.Henry Prabakaran MS

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery,

IRT Perundurai Medical College Hospital

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Ph.No 9842793232