Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 11 November 2017
Hits: 1166

Title: Cartilage Perichondrium Ring Graft versus Cartilage Perichondium Crescent Shaped Graft in Type One Tympanoplasty

Authors: Haitham El-farargy, Mohamed Nasser, Ahmed Gamea, Osama Albirmawy

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.181

Abstract

To improve the functional and audiological results of Tympanoplasty, Ring graft was created but with some difficulty during insertion the graft medial to the handle of malleous. As a trial to overcome this disadvantage, we created a novel graft: cartilage-perichondrium-composite crescent shaped graft, which is put later all to the handle of malleous  below the annulus ( underlay). It has the same functional and audiological results of the ring graft but with a shorter time, making it superior in tympanoplasty type one

Keywords: tympanoplasty, cartilage, ring, crescent.

References

  1. Albirmawy OA. Comparison between cartilage-perichondrium composite ‘ring
  2. graft and temporalis fascia in type one tympanoplasty in children .J LaryngolOtol 2010;124:967-74
  3. Atef A, Talaat N, Moseleh M, Safwat S. Effect of the thickness of the cartilage disk on the hearing results after perichondrium-cartilage island flap tympanoplasty. ORL 2007;69:207–11
  4. Derlacki EL. Residual perforation after tympanoplasty: office technique for closure. OtolaryngolClinNorth Am1982; 15:861-7
  5. Dornhover J. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1094–9
  6. Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, technique, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series. Laryngoscope 2003;112:1944–56
  7. Dornhoffer JL. Cartilage tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006;39:1161-76
  8. Duckert LG, MullerJ, Makielski KH, Helms J. Composite autograft "shield" reconstruction of remnant tympanic membranes .Am j Otol 1995;16:21-6
  9. Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1994–99
  10. Gibb AG, Chang SK. Myringoplasty (a review of 365 operations).J LaryngolOtol 1982;96:915–30
  11. Gross CW, Bassila M, Lazar RH, Long TE, Stagner S. Adipose plug myringop-lasty: an alternative to formal myringoplasty techniques in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 101:617–20
  12. Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations; a comparison with temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:985-9
  13. Kerr AG, Byrene JET, Smyth GDL. Cartilage homografts in the middle ear: a long term histologic study. J LaryngolOtol 1973;87:1193–9
  14. Mansour MH, Askar MH, AlbirmawyOA. Repair of tympanic membrane perforation using a modified cartilage -perichondrium composite ring graft. J LaryngolOtol 2006;120:952–4
  15. Milewski C,Giannakopoulos N, Muller J, Schon F.Tragus perichondrium island transplant in middle ear surgery. Methods and results after 5 years [in German].HNO 1996;44:235–41
  16. Ozbek C, Ciftci O, Tuna E, Yazkan O, Ozdem C. A comparison of cartilage palis-ades and fascia in type I tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. OtolNeurotol 2008;29:679–83
  17. Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I:historical review of the literature. Laryngoscope 1997; 107:1–25
  18. Page C, Charlet L, Strunski V. Cartilage  tympanoplasty: postoperative functional results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1196–8
  19. Pfattz CR, Griesemer C. a new biomaterial for tympanoplasty: preliminary report. Am J Otol 1985; 6:266–8
  20. Zollner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound conducting apparatus. J laryngolOtol 1952;69:657-68

Corresponding Author

Haitham El-farargy

ENT Department, Alhayat National Hospital, Jizan, Saudi Arabia