Title: The Study on the Prevalance of Retromolar Foramen of Adult Dried Mandibles in Uttarakhand Northern Region of India and Its Clinical Significance

Authors: Shikha Malik, Rajkumar, Kumud Dharwal, Kamlesh

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i10.105

Abstract

Aim and Objective: The current finding is about to observe the presence of  retromolar foramen (RMF ) bilaterally, on the right and on the left side and to look into the prevalance of RMF on retromolar triangle in cadaveric dry human mandible.

Materials and Methods: In this study all available 72 dry, fully ossified adult mandibles from the  department of Anatomy, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand northernregion of India had been covered barring gender and age distinction. The mandibles were observed for the presence and absence of retromolar foramen.

Result: The retromolar foramen located at 24 (33.3%) of 72 mandibles of which 7 on the right side (9.7%),11 on the left side (15.2%),and 6 bilaterally (8%). From above statistics it is found that Retromolar Foramen  located greater on Left side than the right side.

Conclusion: The knowledge about variations of the retromolar foramen is necessary for practising surgeons, it has been not properly mentioned in all textbooks so on this basis the presentstudy is achieved to consider  the incidence of the retromolar foramen and its location in human mandibles.

Keyword: Dry adult mandible, Retro molar fossa, and Retro molar foramen.

References

  1. Lipski,I.M.Tomaszewska, W. Lipska, G.J. Lis, K.A. Tomaszewski. The mandible and its foramen: anatomy, anthropology, embryology and resulting clinical implication. Folia Morphol.2013. vol.72, no.4, pp.285-292.DOI: 10.5603/FM.2013.0048.
  1. Ash M, Nelson S J. Wheelers dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion, 8th Ed, Elsevier, St Louis, MO. 2003; pp. 398.
  2. Libersa JC, Francke JP, Boudin G, Goudaert M, Libersa C .Anatomical basis for the surgical approach to the dental roots. Anat Clin.1982.vol. 3: 221-227.
  3. Claeys V. &Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2005; 34(1): 55-8.
  4. Suazo Gic, Zavando Mda, and Smith Rl. Is the conduct of Serres an anatomical variation in adults. International Journal of Morphology. 2009; 27(1):43-47.
  5. Sawyer D. R. & Kiely M. L. Retromolar foramen: A mandibular variant important to dentistry. Ann.Dent. 1991; 50(1): 16-8.
  6. Libersa JC, Francke JP, Boudin G, Goudaert M, Libersa C. Anatomical basis for the surgical approach to the dental roots. AnatClin. 1982; 3: 221-227.
  7. Ossenberg, N. S. Retromolar foramen of the human mandible. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1987; 73(1): 119-28.
  8. Min Kyu Park, Sol Ji Ryu, Sung Ho Kim, Hyun Ho Kwak. Morphometric study of the Retromolar Triangle and Foramen in Korean Mandibles. Korean J Phys Anthropol.2014 Jun. vol. 27(2):65-70. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2014.27.2.65.
  9. T Kawai, R Asaumi, I Sato, Y Kumazawa, T Yosue. Observation of the retromolar foramen and canal of the mandibles: a CBCT and macroscopicstudy. Oral Radiology. 2012. Vol. 28 (1): 1014.
  10. Motta JuniorJ, Ferreira ML,Matheus RA, Stabile GAV. Forameretromolar: sua repercussão clínica eavaliação de 35 mandíbulassecas. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2012. Vol.41:164–168.
  11. Priya R, Manjunath KY, Balasubram-anyam V. Retromolar foramen. Indian J Dent Res. 2005. Vol.16: 15–16.
  12. Han SS, Hwang YS. Cone beamCT findings of retromolar canals in aKorean population. SurgRadiolAnat. 2014. Vol.36:871–876.
  13. Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N. Clinicaland anatomical study of retromolarforamen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2006. vol.64:1493–1497.
  14. K Narayana, U A Nayak, W N Ahmad, J G Bhat, B A Devaiah. The retromolar foramen and canal in south Indian dry mandibles. European Journal of Anatomy. 2002; 6 (3): 141-146.
  15. Suazo GI, Zavando MD, CantínLM. Retromolar canal and foramen prevalence in dried mandibles and clinical implicat-ions. Int J Odontostomatol. 2008. Vol.2:183–187.
  16. Sawyer DR, Kiely ML. Retromolar foramen: a mandibular variant important to dentistry. Ann Dent. 1991; 50: 16-18.
  17. Von Arx T, Hanni A, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Radiographic study of the mandibularretromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance. J Endod. 2011. Vol. 37:1630-1635
  18. S A Athavale, M Vijaywargia, R Deopujari, S Kotgirwar. Bony and cadaveric study of retromolar region. People’s Journal of Scientific Research.2013. vol. 6 (2): 14–18.

Corresponding Author

Dr Rajkumar

Assistant Professor, Glocal Medical College Super Specialty Hospital and Research Centre,

Mirzapur Pole, U.P. 247122 India