Title: Evaluation of adherence to surgical prophylaxis guidelines and expenditure on antimicrobial agents used for surgical prophylaxis

Authors: Mahendra M. Gaikwad, Sangeeta S. Dabhade, Balasaheb B. Ghongane

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i10.71

Abstract

 

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) accounts for 15% of all nosocomial infections and represents the most common nosocomial infection.

Aims: To evaluate adherence to surgical prophylaxis guidelines and expenditure because of non-adherence to guidelines regarding antimicrobial agents (AMA) used for surgical prophylaxis.

Settings and Design: Prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods and Material: A prospective, observational study was conducted in 600 surgical cases from General surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Orthopaedics departments in a tertiary care hospital. Data were collected from medical case sheets about AMA used for surgical prophylaxis with regards to dose, timing, frequency, duration and expenditure on AMA. Appropriateness of surgical prophylaxis was evaluated with National treatment guidelines-2016 and hospital antibiotic policy.

Statistical analysis used: Microsoft excel 2013

Results: The Choice of antimicrobial agent was in adherence to guideline in 87.30%, 80.30% and 83.50% cases and total duration of surgical prophylaxis was in adherence to guidelines in only 15.74%, 16.16% and 0% cases in General surgery and Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Orthopaedics respectively. This non-adherence leads to additional expenditure on surgical prophylaxis which was Rs. 162.76 ± 168.50, Rs. 353.09 ± 140.00 and Rs. 130.06 ± 124.74 per patient for General surgery, Orthopaedics and Obstetrics and Gynaecology departments respectively.

Conclusions: Prolonged duration of surgical prophylaxis and in some extend inapt choice causes increased costs for the health care system, emphasizing on continued surveillance of surgical prophylaxis practices.

Keywords: Surgical prophylaxis, antimicrobial agents, expenditure, adherence.

References

  1. Watanabe A, Kohnoe S, Shimabukuro R. Risk factors associated with surgical site infections in upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery. Sur Today. 2008; 38:404-12.
  2. Woods R K, Dellinger E P.Current Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wounds. Am Fam Physician 1998; 57:2731-40.
  3. Tripathi KD. Essentials of medical pharmacology.7th Ed.New Delhi:Jaypee; 2013. Chapter 49: Antimicrobial drugs: General consideration;Pg:701-05.
  4. Rehan HS,Kakkar A,Goel S. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.Int J Infect Contol 2010;06( 2):1-6.
  5. Dettenkofer M, Forster DH, Ebner W, gastmeier P, ruden H, Daschner FD. The practice of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in eight german hospitals. Infection 2002; 30:164-67.
  6. Townsend CM,Beauchamp RD,Evers BM, Mattox KL. Chapter 11: Principles of preoperative and operative surgery. Sabiston Texbook Of Surgery:The biological basis of modern surgical practice; 19th edition;2012; Philadelphia; Elsevier:226-43.
  7. Gagliardi A R, Fenech D, Eskicioglu C, Nathens AB, McLeod R. Factors influencing antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection prevention in general surgey: a review of the literature. Can J Surg 2009;52 :481-89.
  8. Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, et al. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA. 2010;303(24):2479–85.
  9. Salkind AR,Rao KC. Antibiotics prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection. Am Fam Physician.2011 Mar 1;85(5):585-90.
  10. Afzal Khan AK, Mirshad PV, Rashed MR. Usage of Antimicrobials for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI). Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2013 ;7(4): 671-74.
  11. Antibiotic policy-BJ Medical College.

Website:www.bjmcpune.org/Antibiotic%20Policy%202014.doc (Citedon 10/01/2016.15:10:30)

  1. National Treatment Guidelines for Antimicrobial Use in Infectious Diseases. Version 1.0 (2016).National centre for disease control.

Website: pbhealth.gov.in/AMR_guideline7001495889.pdf. (Cited on 10/05/2016.16:20:15)

  1. American Society of Health System Pharmacists. The ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Website:http://www.ashp.org/DocLibrary/BestPractices/TG_Surgical.aspx.(Cited on:13-02-2016.15:32:30.)
  2. Kaur R, Salman MT, Gupta NK, Gupta U, Ahmad A, Verma VK. Presurgical antibiotic prophylaxis pattern in an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital. JK Science.2015; 17(2):73–78.
  3. Ramesh A, Dharini R. Surgical site infection in teaching hospital.Clinio Microbiological and Epidemiological profile. Int J Biol Med Res.2012; 3(3):2050-2053.
  4. Ram VGR, VidyaSagar R.A, Krishnan GG, Senthivelan M. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. World journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences 2014;3: 968–76.
  5. Parulekar L, Soman R, Singhal T, Rodrigues C, Dastur FD, Mehta A. How good is compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in a tertiary care private hospital in India? A prospective study. Indian J Surg 2009;71:15–18.
  6. Prasad AB, Pore SM. Adherence to guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in major elective surgeries in a tertiary care government and a co-operative hospital. Pharmacie Globale (IJCP) 2013;08 (04):1-5.
  7. Sozen H, Cetinkaya M, Murat S, Caylak SD,hazer DB, Canbek U et al. Cost and efficacy of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in a state hospital in turkey. Acta Medica Mediterr. 2013;29:455–60.
  8. Askarian M, Moravveji AR, Mirkhani H, Namazi S, Weed H. Adherence to American Society of Health-System Pharmacists surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in Iran. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27: 876-878.
  9. Hosoglu S, Sunbul M, Erol S, Altindis M, Caylan R, Demirdag K et al. A national survey of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Turkey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.2003; 24: 758-761.
  10. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20:250–78.
  11. Bailly P, Lallemand S, Thouverez M, Talon D. Multicentre study on the appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. J Hosp Infect.2001; 49: 135-138.
  12. Vaisbrud V, Raveh D, Schlesinger Y, Yinnon AM.Surveillance of antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol .1999;20: 610-613.
  13. Al-Momany NH, Al-Bakri AG, Makahleh ZM, Wazaify MMB. Adherence to international antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in cardiac surgery:a Jordanian study demonstrates need for quality improvement. J Manag Care Pharm.2009;15(3):262-71.
  14. Lallemand S, Thouverez M, Bailly P, Bertrand X, Talon D. Non-observance of guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical-site infections. Pharm World Sci.2002;24(3):95-9.
  15. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery. Treat Guidel Med Lett. 2009;7(82):47–52.
  16. Sasse A, Mertens R, Sion JP, Ronveaux O, Bossens M, Mol PD, et al. Surgical prophylaxis in Belgian hospitals: estimate of costs and potential savings. J Antimicrob Chemother.1998;41(2):267-72.
  17. Ozkurt Z, Erol S, Kadanali A, Ertek M, Ozden K, Tasyaran MA. Changes in antibiotic use, cost and consumption after an antibiotic restriction policy applied by infectious disease specialists. Jpn J Infect Dis 2005; 58 : 338-43.

Corresponding Author

Sangeeta S. Dabhade

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Contact No. +91-9823840872