Title: Two Hours vs Six Hours Occlusion Regimen: A Comparative Study for Anisometropic Ambylopia

Authors: Dr Renu Hashia Dhar, Dr Anjali Slathia

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i10.37

Abstract

Aim: To compare two hours vs. six hours occlusion regimen in moderate anisometropic amblyopia in combination with one hour near vision activities in children aged 4-9 years.

Materials and Methods: a cross sectional study was conducted in the department of Ophthalmology, ASCOMS for a period of six month post refractive error correction involving 30 children aged 4-9 years with moderate anisometropic amblyopia. The children were randomly divided into two equal groups: Group A was put on two hours occlusion of the better eye and Group B on six hours occlusion per day along with one hour of near vision activities. The data was analyzed by paired T-test method.

Results: The visual acuity in both the groups showed significant improvement, the mean LogMAR  BCVA in Group A improved from 0.39 to 0.12 and Group B showed improvement from 0.40 to 0.12 respectively, both the difference being stastically significant (p=0.001) respectively. However, no significant difference was observed between Group A and Group B in post occlusion visual acuity after six months of follow up.(p=1.000)

Conclusion: In  moderate anisometropic amblyopia, both two and six hours of occlusion after refractive error correction and when combined with one hour near vision activities produce equivalent amount of improvement in children of younger age group (4-9 years) provided there is good compliance.

Keywords: Ambylopia, occlusion, refractive error, eye-patch.

 

References

  1. Ramanjit Sihota, Radhika Tandon, Parsons’ Diseases of the Eye, 22nd edition, chapter 26, 417
  2. Von Noorden GK (1974) Factors involved in the production of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 58 :158-164
  3. Cotter SA, Edwards AR, Wallace DK, et al. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction, Ophthalmology 2006 ; jun 113(6): 895-903.
  4. Hiscox F, Strong N, Thompson JR et al, Occlusion for amblyopia: A Comprehensive survey of outcome. Eye 1992;6:300-4
  5. Hug T. Full time occlusion compared to part time occlusion for the treatment of amblyopia. Optometery 2004;75:241-4
  6. Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW et al, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2075-87
  7. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The course of moderate amblyopia treatment with patching in children. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136:620-9
  8. Repka Mx, Beck RW, Holmes JM et al, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;110: 603-11
  9. R K Bansal,Shayan Kansal et al, Two hours vs Six hours occlusion for treatment of anisometropic amblyopia. NZOS 2012 April : Vol 19, No 1: 70-71
  10. DK Wallace, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group – Ophthalmology 2006,113(6):904-912
  11. Pang Y et al, A prospective pilot study of treatment outcomes for amblyopia associ-ated with myopic anisometropia. Arch Ophthalmol 2012 May; 130(5): 579-84.
  12. Clearly M, Efficacy of occlusion for strabismic amblyopia: Can optimal duration be identified?
  13. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jun; 84(6):572-578.
  14. Yazdani N, Sadeghi R et al, Part time vs. Full time occlusion therapy for treatment of amblyopia: a meta-analysis. Journal of Current Ophthalmology Vol 29, Issue 2, June 2017:76-84
  15. Mostafa AM, Kassem RR,A bdel- Meguid AAE (2010), Factors affecting compliance to two hour vs.six hours occlusion therapy. Regimens for treatment of strabismic amblyopia. J Clinic Experiment Ophthalmol. 1:110
  16. Sana Al Zuhaibi, Iman Al Harthi et al. Compliance of amblyopic patients with occlusion therapy : A pilot study, Oman J Ophthalmol. 2009 May-Aug 2(2): 67-72
  17. Ahmed Al –Yahya et al, Compliance to patching in treatment of amblyopia, Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol 26, Issue 3, July-Sept 2012;305-307.

Corresponding Author

Dr Anjali Slathia

Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology,

ASCOMS & Hospital, Sidhra,Jammu (J&K),India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Phone no- 9086166848