Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 09 September 2017
Hits: 1327

Title: A Study on Carcinoma Penis

Authors: Dr M. Kumara Senthil, Dr R.Yeganathan, Dr N.Mohammed Niyamathullah, Dr A.Deepa

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i9.146

Abstract

Carcinoma penis is quite common in our country .Though in decreasing trends, its racial, cultural, socioeconomic factors plays role in its etiology. The aims of my study are

To find out the incidence of cancer penis amongst male in proportion to other malignancies which affect them, to find out the age group in which the patients are commonly affected. To find out the influence of the prognostic factors .On the long term survival, to analyze the treatment given and the recurrence rate and the time of recurrence after primary management of cancer is being made.

Materials and Method: This study included biopsy proven 30 cases of carcinoma penis.

Results:  The commonest site of distribution in carcinoma penis is Glans. Ulcero proliferative lesion was the commonest presentation in carcinoma penis. The majority of cases were of Squamous cell carcinoma .The average interval between the onset of disease and the presentation is 8.2 months.

Conclusion: The custom of early Neonatal circumsion must be adopted as a prophylactic measure, particularly those with phimosis.

Keywords: Carcinoma penis, stages ,nodal status, follow-up.

 

References

  1. Bailey and love 25th
  2. Short case of Das.
  3. Camphbel’s urology new edition.
  4. Oxford Textbook of Oncology (2nd edition). EdsSouhami et al. Oxford University Press, 2002.
  5. Jackson SM: The treatment of carcinoma of the penis, Br J urol 1966; 53: 33-35.
  6. Article of Shrivatasava, Indian Journal of surgery.
  7. Persky L. Dekernion J: Carcionoma of the penis. CA 1986; 36:258-273.
  8. Fraley EE, Zhang G, Manuvel C, Niehans GA: The role of ilio-inguinal lymphadenectomy and significance of histological differentiation in treatment of carcinoma of he penis. J Urol 1989; 142:1478-1482.
  9. MeDougal WS: Carcionma of the penis: Improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 1995; 154: 1364-1366.
  10. Jackson SM: The treatment of carcionoma of the penis Br J Urol 1966; 53: 33-35.
  11. Solsona E, Jborra J, Ricos JV, et al : Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node metastases. EurUrol 1992; 22: 115-118.
  12. Johnson De, Lo RK: Management of regional lymph nodes in penile carcionoma; Five year results following therapeutic groin dissections. Urology 1984; 24; 352-355.
  13. Srinivas V, Morse MJ, Herr HW, et all: Penile cancer: relation of extent of nodal metastases to survival. J Urol 1987; 137: 880-886.
  14. Catalona WJ: Role of Iymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the penis urolClin NA 980; 7 85-89
  15. Ravi R: Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol 1993; 941-45

Corresponding Author

Dr N.Mohammed Niyamathullah

Resident, Department of General Surgery, Thanjavur Medical College