Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 09 September 2017
Hits: 2991

Title: A Comparative Study of Maximum Anal Dilatation with Fissurectomy and Lateral Anal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Fissure in Ano

Authors: Dr S. Ajay Venkatesh, Dr R. Manoj Chandran, Dr J.X.A. Manfred Fernando

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i9.77

Abstract

Aim: To Prospectively assess and evaluate the results of maximum anal dilatation with fissurectomy v/s lateral anal sphincterotomy among the patients with fissure in ano.

Materials and Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at Vinayaka Missions Kirupananda Variyar Medical college and Hospital, Salem during the period between June 2013 –June 2015. 50 patients of fissure in ano were included in the study. After getting the written informed consent from the patients 25 patients were treated with maximum anal dilatation with fissurectomy and the other 25 patients had undergone the lateral anal sphincterotomy procedure for the fissure in ano.

Results: All the operated patients were followed up for a period of 3 months and the findings seen at the end of 3 months of follow up were bleeding  was not present  in both the maximum anal dilatation (MAD) with fissurectomy and lateral anal sphincterotomy group whereas all other features like pain, persistent spasm, fecal incontinence and delayed wound healing were present in almost 50% patients in the maximum anal dilatation with fissurectomy group and none of the patients had any of these features in lateral sphincterotomy group and the difference was found to be statistically significant.(p < .0001).

Conclusion: In the surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure not responding to conservative management, lateral internal sphincterotomy may be the better Treatment and perhaps the preferable surgical technique with fewer total complications when compared with maximum anal dilatation with Fissurectomy.

References

  1. D.Wexener, Pruritus Ani and Anal Fissure (18). In:David.E.Beck and David. R.Welling editor. Patient care in colorectal surgery, 2nd edition;1991. P243-254.
  2. Cook T.A, Brading A.F, Mortensen N.J. McC. Contractile properties of ano rectal smooth muscle. Br J Surg 1999;86:70-75.
  3. Stebbing J.F, Brading A.F.Mortensen N.J. Nitregenic inhibitory innervation of procrine rectal circular smooth muscle. Br J Surg 1995;85:1183-7.
  4. Robert J.C. Steele and Kenneth Campbell. Disorders of anal canal(15). In:Sir Alfred Cuschieri, Robert J.C.Steele and Abdool Rahim Moosa editors. Essential Surgical practice, 4th edition 2002. P642-643.
  5. Williams, M.J.Cheetham, C.I Bartram, S.Hallinga n,M.A.Kamm.R.J.Nicholls and W.A.Kmiot. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure sa demonstrated on three dimensional anal endo-sonography from: URL: http://www.bjs.co.uk/87/12/abstract/bjs1958.asp.
  6. M.Fynes, M.Behan, C.O’herlihy and P.R.O’connel. Anal vector volume analysis complements endo-anal ultrasono-graphic assessment of postpartal anal sphincter injury from URL: http:/ /www.bjs.co.uk/87/9/abstract/bjs1958.asp.
  7. Terry C.Hicks and Frank G.Opleka. Rectal and perianal complaints(30). In:Hirman C.Polk, Jr. Bernand. Gardner and H. Harlon Stone editors. Basic Surgery, 4th edition 1993.p.550-551.
  8. Dziki A, Trzcinski R, Langner E, Wronski W. New approaches to the treatment of anal fissure. Acta Chir Iugosl 2002;49:73.
  9. Gupta PJ. A study of hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous polyps associated with chronic anal fissures. Rom J Gastroenterol 2004;13:103-107.
  10. Nelson R. Treatment of anal fissure(Editorial). BMJ 2003;327:354-355.
  11. Bove A, Balzano A, Perotti P, Antropoli C, Lombardi G, Pucciani F. Different anal pressure profiles in patients with anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol 2004;8:151-156.
  12. Ammari FF, Bani-Hani KE. Faecal incontinence in patients with anal fissure: a consequence of internal sphincterotomy or a feature of the condition? Surgeon 2004;2:225-229.
  13. Sandelewski A, Korenza J, Dyaczynski M, Tomsia D. Chronic anal fissure – conservative or surgical treatment? Wiad Lek 2004;57:80-84.
  14. Lindsey I, Jones OM, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ. Chronic anal fissure. Br J Surg 204;91:270-279.
  15. Nielsen MB, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Risk of sphincter damage and anal incontinence after anal dilatation for fissure in An endosonographic study. Dis colom Rectum 1993;36:677-680.
  16. Nelson R, Mehrabian E. Meta-analysis of operative techniques for fissure in ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1424-1428.
  17. Nelson R. Operative procedures for fissure in ano. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;CD002199.
  18. Gupta JP. Current trends of management for fissure in ano. Rom J Gastroenterol 2002;11:25-27.
  19. Gupta JP. Sphincterotomy with radio frequency surgery: a new treatment technique of fissure in ano and associated pathologies. Rom J Gastroenterol 2003;12;37-40.
  20. Sohn N, Eisenberg MM, Weinstein MA, Lugo RN, Ader J. Precise anorectal sphincter dilatation – its role in the therapy of ana fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:322-7.
  21. Dicastro A, Biancari F, D’Andrea V, Caviglia A. Fissurectomy with posterior midline sphincterotomy and anoplasty in the management of chronic anal fissures. Surg Today 1997;27;975-8.

Corresponding Author

Dr R. Manoj Chandran

Post Graduate Student, Dept of Surgery

Vinayaka Missions Kirupananda Variyar Medical College, Vinayaka mission University, Salem, Tamil Nadu