Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 09 September 2017
Hits: 1749

Title: Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Following a Trial of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section at Tertiary Care Teaching Hospitals in India

Authors: Balwan Singh Dhillon, Nomita Chandhiok, D.K. Shukla

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i9.37

Abstract

Background: Repeat caesarean section and planned vaginal birth after caesarean section are both associated with benefits and harms.

Methods: Prospective data was recorded on management practices, associated complications, morbidity and mortality on 15664 consecutive cases of previous cesarean section reporting at 30 medical colleges/teaching hospitals for delivery.

Results: A total of 4035 (25.8%) women out of the 15664 women with a previous cesarean section underwent a trial of labor (TOL). Of these, 2513 (62.0%) had a successful trial of labor (S-TOL) while the rest required an emergency repeat cesarean section. The overall maternal morbidity was 2.3%and 34.0% in women with S-TOL and failed trial of labor (F-TOL) respectively. Blood loss  more than 1000ml was seen in 20.6% of cases with F-TOL where as for S-TOL it was 0.3%, blood transfusion was 7.0% in F-TOL where as it was 0.8% in S-TOL, dehiscence of scar in F-TOL was 5.4% as compared to 0.2% in S-TOL, post-operative complication/delivery were seen in 6.8% cases in F-TOL where as in S-TOL it was 0.4%, uterine rupture was 0.7% in F-TOL as compared to 0.1% in S-TOL and was statistically significant. Maternal death was seen in 4 (0.3%) cases of F-TOL as compared to 6 (0.2%) cases in S-TOL (p=0.45) and the difference was not significant. There were 27 (1.8%) child deaths who born after F-TOL as compared to 65 (2.6%) born after S-TOL which was highly significant (P=0.00).

Conclusions: Women who experience failed trial of labor have higher risk of morbidity as compared to those with a successful trial of labor. More accurate prediction for safe, successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery is needed.

Keywords: Cesarean section, trail of labor, maternal morbidity, mortality.

References

  1. Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC. A critical appraisal of cesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79:151-8.
  2. Treffers P, Pel M. The rising trend for caesarean birth. BMJ 1993; 307: 1017-1019
  3. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes W, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labour with elective second caesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996; 15:121 – 126
  4. Okpere EE, Oronsaye AU, Imoedmhe DAG. Pregnancy and delivery after caesarean section: a review of 494 cases. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1981;3: 45-48
  5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guideline for vaginal delivery after previous caesarean birth.Int J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 52; 90-98
  6. Cowan RK, Kinch RA, Ellis B, Anderson R. Trial of labour following caesarean delivery. ObstetGynecol 1994; 83: 933-936
  7. Iloabachie CC. Delivery after a caesarean section. A review of 836 cases. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1981; 7: 9-10
  8. Miller DA, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience. ObstetGynecol 1994;84:255-8.
  9. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesareandelivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:927-32.
  10. Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:750-4.
  11. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of Indicat-ors for success. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76: 865-9.
  12. Paul RH, Phelan JP, Yeh SY. Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:297-304.
  13. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta- Analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:465- 70.
  14. Features leading to increase caesarean section rate.Gomal J Med Sci 2008; 6 (1): 1-5.
  15. Dhillon BS, ChandhiokN, Bharti S, Bhatia P, Coyaji KJ, Das MC, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) versus emergency repeatcesarean section at  teaching hospitals in India: an ICMR task force study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol2014;3:592-7.
  16. Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y,TeC, Karrison T, Ismail MA.Failed vaginal birth After aces are an section: Howriskyisit? Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1365–71; discussion 1371–3.2001.
  17. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW,et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with atrial of labor after prior cesarean N Engl J Med 351(25): 2581–9.2004.
  18. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM,et al.Maternal Complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Amulticenter study. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1656–62.2005.
  19. Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, Lezotte D, Lynch AM. Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery. Obstet  Gynecol 2009; 113:1231-8.
  20. Shah JM, Mehta MN. Analysis of mode of delivery in women with previous one cesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol India 2009; 59:136-9.
  21. Jha M. Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous cesarean Section. Nepal Health Res Counc 2009; 7:25-8.

Corresponding Author

B.S. Dhillon

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.