Title: Volume of contrast to creatinine clearance ratio: a novel pharmacokinetic index for prediction of contrast induced nephropathy in stage three chronic kidney disease patients undergoing coronary angioplasty

Authors: Dr Sanjai Pattu Valappil MD.DM.DNB, Dr Praveen Velappan MD.DM, Dr Sunitha Viswanathan MD.DM.FESC.FSCAI, Dr Alummoottil George Koshy  MD.DM.FESC.FSCAI.FACC.FRCP, Dr Prabha Nini Gupta MD.DM.FSCAI, Dr Radhakrishnan Vallikkattu Velayudhan MD.DM.FESC. FACC, Dr Mathew Iype MD.DNB.DM.DNB, Dr Dilip Mazhavancheri Narayanan MD.DM

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.170

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to identify the optimal ‘Volume of contrast to Creatinine Clearance ratio’ {V/CrCl} for prediction of contrast induced nephropathy {CIN} in stage III chronic kidney disease {CKD} patients undergoing coronary angioplasty.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study where stage III CKD patients, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 30-60 ml/mt undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention {PCI} over a period of 15 months were evaluated prospectively for the development of CIN. Receiver-operator characteristic {ROC} curves were used to identify the optimal sensitivity and specificity for the observed range of V/CrCl. The predictive value of V/CrCl for the risk of CIN was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: 100 stage III CKD patients underwent PCI during the study period.  The incidence of CIN was 29 %. Based on the ‘Volume of contrast /Creatinine clearance ratio {V/CrCl} the quartiles of the V/CrCl ratio for all the patients were as follows: quartile (Q1) (<3.45, n=25); Q2 (3.45-4.28, n=25); Q3 (4.28-5.31, n=25); and Q4 (>5.31, n=25). The receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis indicated that a V/CrCl ratio of 4 was a fair discriminator for the development of CIN {C-statistic 0.69}. After adjusting for other known predictors of CIN, a V/CrCl ratio of 4 was found to be significantly associated with the development of CIN {OR: 2.849, 95 % CI: 0.972-8.363, p=0.05}

Conclusion: A V/CrCl ratio of > 4 was a significant and independent predictor of CIN in stage III CKD patients undergoing PCI.

Keywords: Contrast; nephropathy; angioplasty.

References

  1. Osborne Ed, Sutherland CG, Scholl AJ et al Roentgenography of urinary tract during excretion of Sodium Iodide. JAMA; 1923 Feb 10; 80:368.
  2. Brooks .B Intraarterial injection of Sodium Iodide.JAMA; 1924 Mar 29; 82:1016.
  3. Persson PB, Hansell P, Liss P. Pathophysiology of contrast medium-induced nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2005 Jul; 68:14–22.
  4. Almén T. Contrast media: the relation of chemical structure, animal toxicity and adverse clinical effects. Am J Cardiol 1990 Oct 26;66:2F–8F.
  5. Rudnick MR, Goldfarb S, Wexler L et al. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study. Kidney Int 1995 Jan;47:254–61.
  6. Thomsen HS. European Society of Urogenital Radiology ( ESUR ) guidelines on the safe use of iodinated contrast media. 2006;60:307–13.
  7. Chalmers N, Jackson RW. Comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in renal impairment. Br J Radiol 1999 Jul;72:701–3.
  8. Jo S-H, Youn T-J, Koo B-K, Park J-S, Kang H-J, Cho Y-S, et al. Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2006 Sep 5; 48:924–30.
  9. Eisenberg RL, Bank WO, Hedgock MW. Renal failure after major angiography can be avoided with hydration. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1981 May ;136:859–61.
  10. Trivedi HS, Moore H, Nasr S, et al. A randomized prospective trial to assess the role of saline hydration on the development of contrast nephrotoxicity. Nephron Clin Pract . 2003 Jan; 93:C29-34.
  11. Hoffmann U, Fischereder M, Krüger B, Drobnik W, Krämer BK. The value of N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of radiocontrast agent-induced nephropathy seems questionable. J Am Soc Nephrol . 2004 Feb; 15:407–10.
  12. Gurm HS, Dixon SR, Smith DE et al. Renal function-based contrast dosing to define safe limits of radiographic contrast media in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:907–14.
  13. Laskey WK, Jenkins C, Selzer F et al. Volume-to-Creatinine Clearance Ratio. A Pharmacokinetically Based Risk Factor for Prediction of Early Creatinine Increase After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:584–90.
  14. Tan N, Liu Y, Zhou Y-L et al. Contrast medium volume to creatinine clearance ratio: A predictor of contrast-induced nephropathy in the first 72 hours following percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012 Jan 1;79:70–5.
  15. Barbieri L, Verdoia M, Marino Pet al Novara Atherosclerosis Study Group. Contrast volume to creatinine clearance ratio for the prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous intervention. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jun 2;23:931–7.
  16. Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Williams RH, et al. Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med. 1989 Jun;86:649–52.
  17. Freeman R V, O’Donnell M, Share D, Meengs WL, Kline-Rogers E, Clark VL, et al. Nephropathy requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary intervention and the critical role of an adjusted contrast dose. Am J Cardiol . 2002 Nov 15;90:1068–73.
  18. Altmann DB, Zwas D, Spatz A et al Use of the Contrast Volume to Estimated Creatinine Clearance Ratio to Predict Renal Failure After Angiography. J Interv Cardiol 1997 Apr 1; 10:113–9.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sanjai Pattu Valappil MD.DM.DNB

Department of Cardiology,

Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram