Title: Comparative Study of Skin Staples and Polypropylene Sutures for Securing the Mesh in Lichtenstein’s Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Authors: Dr Kaushal K. Gupta, Dr Ramgopal Meena, Dr Romil Singh, Dr Rakesh K. Sharma

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.145

Abstract

Background: Fixation of the mesh in Lichtenstein's inguinal hernioplasty is traditionally performed with polypropylene sutures. A modification of this technique uses skin staples for securing of the mesh. This study compared two methods of mesh fixation.

Material and Methods:  Forty six patients undergoing fifty repairs were randomized into two groups. In control group polypropylene mesh was secured with 2/0 polypropylene sutures and skin closed with 2/0 ethilon. In study group polypropylene mesh was secured with skin staples and skin was closed with staples from the same stapler. Duration of surgery, post-operative complications, recurrence and costs were compared.

Results: The operation was significantly shorter when staples were used (mean 36 minute versus 52 minute, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. There were no recurrences in either group in the follow up period (median 3 months).

Conclusion: The use of skin staples to secure mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty significantly reduced the duration of surgery and was as effective as conventional mesh fixation with polypropylene in the short term

One more advantage of using skin stapler for mesh fixation in HIV and hepatitis B positive patients is to reduces the operating time thus reduces the duration of exposure to infected blood as well as it reduces the chances of needle prick injury.

KEY WORDS: Inguinal hernia, Lichtenstein hernioplasty, Skin staples, Polypropylene sutures.

References

  1. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK et al. The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surgery 1989;157 : 188-193
  2. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstien IL. A critical scrutiny of the open “tension-free” Hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1993;165:369-71.
  3. Eggar B, Fawcett D, Dowling BL. Use of skin staples for securing the mesh in the Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Ann R CollSurgEngl 1996; 78(1): 63-4
  4. Mills, I. M. Mcdermott, D. A. Ratliff. Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare skin staples and polypropylene for securing the mesh in inguinal hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery 1998; 85: 790-2.
  5. Eggar B, Fawcett D, Dowling BL. Use of skin staples for securing the mesh in the Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Ann R CollSurgEngl 1996; 78(1): 63-4
  6. Janu PG, Sellers KD, Mangiante EC. Mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy: A ten-year review. Am Surg 1997;63:1065-71
  7. Roshanlall C, Hutchinson GH. Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare skin staples and polypropylene for securing the mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 1998; 85(10):1451.
  8. Chaitanya PG, Ashok MB, Chetan DP et al. comparative study of skin staples and polypropylene sutures for securing the mesh in Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair; A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Indian J Surgery 2004; 66(3):152-5.
  9. Cheek C. Use of skin staples for securing mesh in the Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78:398
  10. Kingsnorth AN. Use of skin staples for securing mesh in the Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78:398
  11. Louis Fligelstone. Use of skin staples for securing mesh in the Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78:398.
  12. Gould SW. Use of skin staples for securing mesh in the Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78:235.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ramgopal Meena

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Mobile no. -09462655110