Title: Biometric Evaluation of Eyes with Simple Myopia – Our Study

Authors: Dr Prangya  Panda, Dr Sangita Basantaroy, Dr Bijaya Kumar Sadangi, Dr Sarita Panda, Dr Santosh Kumar Sethy, Dr Sabita Devi

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.134

Abstract

The focusing system of eye is composed of several refracting structures which include cornea, aqueous humor, crystalline lens and vitreous humor. The overall refractive state of eye is determined by four components: Corneal power, anterior chamber depth, crystalline lens power and axial length. A state of emmetropia during development of eyeball is therefore the result of harmonious interplay of these components. Refractive error represents a mismatch between the eye’s focal length and its axial length. In this study, in simple myopic eyes with refractive error correction, we have done the biometry to know any correlation between biometric measures and degree of refractive error. Mean axial length in myopic was about 24.35±0.85 mm, which was more than the emmetropic eye and we found that there was a positive correlation between degree of myopia and axial length .In myopia we found deep anterior chamber and mean was 3.59 ± 0.28, p* = < 0.03 which indicates that there is positive correlation between degree of myopia and anterior chamber depth.

Keywords: Emmetropia, ammetropia, myopia, hypermetropia, astigmatism, keratometry,  a-scan, axial length, biometric measure, fundoscopy.

References

  1. Duke-Elder S : System of Ophthalmology, Vol V, Ophthalmic optics and refraction, St Louis, The C. V. Mosby Co. , 1970.
  2. Wallmann J, Adams J. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Res. 1987; 27: 1139-1163.
  3. American Academy of Ophthalmology : Basic and Clinical Science Course; section 3, clinical optics, 2007-2008: 116.
  4. American Academy of Ophthalmology: Basic and Clinical Science Course; section 3 San Francsico: 1994-1995: 116-117.
  5. Agarwal L P: Principles of optics and refraction: 2nd 1979; Delhi, CBS publishers; 94-95.
  6. Ward B, Thompson FB. The Myopias: Pathogenesis and pathophysiology. In Myopia surgery, Mac Millan Publishing Co, Inc, New York; p. 1-30.
  7. Duke- Elder’s practice of refraction, 10th Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006; p. 58.
  8. Donders, F,On the anomalies of accommodation and refraction of eye 1864, London: New Sydenham Society.
  9. Duke- Elder’s practice of refraction, 10th Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006; p. 45-52.
  10. Clinical optics, 3rd Andrew R Elkington, Helena J. Frank, Michael J Greaney; p. 114.
  11. Theory and practice of optics and refraction, 2nd edition: AK Khurana; p-62.
  12. Khurana AK, Khurana. I. Cornea, limbus and sclera. Chapter-2.In Anatomy and physiology of eye. 1998. 1st ed. New Delhi; CBSPublishers.P15-32.
  13. Khurana AK. Errors of refraction and binocular optical defects. Chapter3. In: Theory and practice of optics and refraction. 1st Edn. , New Delhi Elsevier; 2005. p. 53-78.
  14. Theory and practice of optics and refraction: AK KHURANA,2nd edition; ELSEVIER.
  15. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Sheridan M. Refraction and its components during the growth of the eye from the age of three. MRC special report series no 301. London: HMSO, 1961.
  16. Adams AJ. Axial length elongation, not corneal curvature, as a basis of adult onset myopia. Am J OptomPhysiol Opt. 1987; 64: 150–152.

Corresponding Author

Dr Bijaya Kumar Sadangi

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Mobile Number --+91 9861066778