Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 08 August 2017
Hits: 1906

Title: Clinico-Microbiological Profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: The common Anatomical site

Authors: Dibya Prasana Mohanty, Shalini Shenoy Mulki, Dharma Niranjan Mishra

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.100

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is one of the oldest diseases known to mankind.  Ulceration of the foot in diabetes is a common complication. Diabetic foot ulcers are at high risk of infection secondary to high glucose levels and poor tissue perfusion. The aim is to identify the microorganisms and the antibiotic susceptibility pattern involved in different grades of diabetic foot ulcer.

Materials and Methods: 50 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) were included in this study. Pus was processed for Gram positive, Gram negative and Fungal isolates by culture. Antibiotic sensitivity testing was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test. 

Results: Out of 135 isolates, Gram negative bacteria comprised the major group of 73 (54.1%) followed by Gram positive bacteria 54 (40%) and Fungus 08 (5.9%) were observed on culture. Staphylococcus aureus (61.1%) in the Gram positive group is the commonest pathogen followed by Enterococcus spp (27.8%) and Streptococcus spp (11.1%). 44.5% of Staphylococci were methicillin resistant.  Multi-drug resistance was seen in 28.26% of isolates. We observed ESBL producer in 18 (58.06%) isolates out of 31 Gram negative strain.  Elderly male with Type II diabetes (NIDDM) cases were frequently observed to develop foot ulcer.  

Conclusion: Diabetic foot infections are polymicrobial in nature.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Gram negative organisms followed by Staphylococcus aureus in Gram positive group and Candida spp  in fungal were the predominant pathogens. Empirical antibiotic selection should be followed by culture guided adjunctive therapy. Erythromycin, Lincomycin, Imipenem or Cefoperazone + Sulbactam would be appropriate for empirical treatment.

Abbreviations: NIDDM – non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

Key words: NIDDM, Gram-negative bacilli, polymicrobial.

References

  1. Levin ME. An overview of the Diabetic foot: Pathogenesis, Management and Prevention of Lesions. Int. J. Diab. Dev. Countries 1994; 14: 39-41
  2. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and other categories of Glucose Intolerance. Diabetes 1979; 28: 1039-57
  3. Viswanathan V, Thomas N, Tandon N. Profile of Diabetic Foot Complications and its Associated Complications- A multicentric study from India. JAPI 2005; 53: 933-36.
  4. Ramachandran A. Epidemiology of diabetes in India- Three Decades of Research. JAPI 2005; 53: 34-38.
  5. Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Lancet 2003; 361: 1545-51.
  6. Rauwerda JA. Foot debridement: anatomic knowledge is mandatory. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000;16(1):S23–6.
  7. Lipsky C BA, Pecararo RE, Larson SA. Outpatient management of uncomplicated lower extremity infections in diabetic patients. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150:790-97
  8. Rayfield EJ, Ault MJ, Keusch GT. Infection and Diabetes: the case of glucose control. The American journal of medicine 1982;72:439-50.
  9. Sentochink DE, Eliopoulos GM. Infection and Diabetes. Joslins diabetes mellitus. 13th Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1994: 1017-22
  10. Pathare NA, Bal A, Talvalkar GV. diabetic foot infections: A study of Microorganisms associated with the different Wagner Grades. Indian J. pathol Microbiol. 1998; 41(4): 437-41
  11. Ahmad T, El-Tahaway. Bacteriology of diabetic foot infections. Saudi Medical Journal 2000; 21(4): 344-47
  12. Wheat JL, Allen SD, Hnery M, Kernt CB, Siders JA, Quebler T. Diabetic foot infections. bacteriological analysis. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146: 1935-40.
  13. Scher KS, Steele FJ. The septic foot in patients with diabetes. Surgery 1998; 104 (4): 661-66.
  14. Bansal E, Garg A, Bhatia G, Attri AK, Chander J. Spectrum of microbial flora in diabetic foot ulcers. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 2008; 51(2): 204-08.
  15. Ramachandran A, Mary S, Sathish CK, Selvam S, Catherin Seeli A. Population based study of quality of diabetes care in southern India. JAPI 2008; 56: 513-16.
  16. Gadepalli R, Dhawan B, Sreenivas V, Kapil Aet. A clinico microbiological study of diabetic foot ulcers in an Indian tertiary care hospital. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1727-32.
  17. Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Nesbit CA. Diabetic foot infection. Bacteriology and activity of 10 oral antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated from consecutive cases. Diabetes Care 1996; 19(6): 638-51.
  18. Gaur DS, Verma A, Gupta P. Diabetic foot in Uttaranchal. JK Science, 2007; 9(1): 18-20.
  19. Mahmood K, Akhtar ST, Talib A, Abbasi B. Clinical profile and management outcome of diabetic foot ulcers in a tertiary care hospital. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2008; 18(7): 408-12
  20. Delbridge L, Clereteko G, Fowler C. Factors associated with the development of lesions in the diabetic. Surgery 1983- 93:(1):78-92.

Corresponding Author

Dharma Niranjan Mishra

Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy S. C. B. Medical College Cuttack753007, Odisha, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.