Title: Comparison of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels among Urban and Rural Diabetic Mellitus Patients

Authors: Suma.H.R, Kavita P Rasalkar, Uzma Anjum, Sanjay Reddy A C, Ramya Raghavan, P Nagaraj Sharma

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.76

Abstract

Introduction: India, the ‘Diabetic Capital of the world’, with all the genetic predisposition, diversity of culture and socioeconomic status, it is very important to know the distribution, the prevalence & complications of diabetes mellitus. It is also very important to have an indicator to monitor the disease burden on the society so that the government can focus on the appropriate resource allocation& implementation of various measures to reduce the disease burden on the society & the patient. Glycated haemoglobin-HbA1c has been proven to be the best indicator of long term glycemic control. It has also been observed to be useful to assess the risk of developing vascular complications and death in diabetic patients. In this study the distribution of patients with diabetes is compared among urban & rural patients based on the HbA1c levels to assess the burden of the disease & its complication on these two societies with socioeconomic diversity.

Objectives: To categorize the patients attending diabetic clinic into four categories based on HbA1c levels.

To study the distribution of the urban & rural patients based on these categories with respect to number, age and sex.

Materials & Methods: The Diabetes Mellitus patients were grouped into four different categories based on their HbA1c levels in both urban & rural study population. The distribution of the patients in different groups among the urban & rural population is compared & studied to assess the burden of the disease with micro & macrovascular complications on these two different societies.

Results & Conclusion: In Group III the Patients with high HbA1c are almost two folds more among rural population when compared to urban population and in Group IV the Patients with high HbA1c are almost ten folds more among rural population when compared to urban population. Identification of the factors which may be influencing these populations - is necessary to facilitate change when facing health challenges. There is an immediate need for implementing preventive measures to bring down the high morbidity and mortality and also to decrease the cost burden to the patients and to the society.

Keywords: HbA1c, Diabetes mellitus, Distribution among urban & rural population, Micro & Macrovascular complications.

References

  1. Bernd Stratmann, Katrin Richter, Ruichao Wang, Zhonghao Yu,  Tao Xu, Cornelia Prehn,  et al. “Metabolomic Signature of Coronary Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus”, International Journal of Endocrinology Volume 2017, Article ID 7938216, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7938216.
  2. Chin-Hsiao Tseng, MD, PhD, “Sex Difference in the Distribution of Atherosclerotic Risk Factors and Their Association with Peripheral Arterial Disease in Taiwanese Type 2 Diabetic Patients”- Circ J 2007; 71: 1131–1136.
  3. C. Gerstein . J. Pogue . J. F. E. Mann . E. Lonn . G. R. Dagenais . M. McQueen . S. Yusuf .[ HOPE investigators], “The relationship between dysglycaemia and cardiovascular and renal risk in diabetic and non-diabetic participants in the HOPE study: a prospective epidemiological analysis”, Diabetologia (2005) 48: 1749–1755.
  4. Irene M Stratton, Amanda I Adler,H Andrew W Neil,David R Matthews,Susan E Manley, Carole A Cull et.al, “Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study” ,BMJ 2000 August 12th, VOLUME 321 : 405 – 412.
  5. Kaveeshwar SA, Cornwall J. The current state of diabetes mellitus in India. AMJ 2014, 7, 1, 45-48. http//dx.doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2014.1979
  6. Gang Hu, AmbadyRamachandran, Snehalathachamukuttan, Hairong Nan [THE DECODA STUDY GROUP], “Age- and Sex-Specific Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Regulation in 11 Asian Cohorts” Diabetes Care,2003, 26:1770–1780.
  7. Nafisa C Vaz, AM Ferreira, MS Kulkarni, Frederick S Vaz, NR Pinto, “Prevalence of Diabetic Complications in Rural Goa, India”, Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 2011 October ,Vol 36, Issue 4- 283 – 286.
  8. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Vijay V, Impact of poverty on the prevalence of diabetes and its complications in urban southern India. King H.Diabet Med. 2002 Feb;19 (2):130-5.
  9. Zoungas& J. Chalmers & T. Ninomiya& Q. Li & M. E. Cooper & S. Colagiuri& G. Fulcher et al. “Association of HbA1c levels with vascular complications and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence of glycaemic thresholds”, Diabetologia (2012) 55:636–643.
  10. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986.

Corresponding Author

Dr Kavita Rasalkar

Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry,

PES Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Kuppam, Chittoor, A.P, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.