Title: Clinical and Ultrasonographic Assessment of Liver Span in Children

Authors: Dr Sripriya R, Dr Karthick AR, Dr Natarajan, Dr Gangadharan S

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.59

Abstract

Background: Hepatomegaly is an important clue to a variety of systemic pathological conditions. Palpable liver does not denote hepatomegaly. Measurement of liver span is more reliable than palpation just below costal margin. Ultrasonographic evaluation of liver size provides accurate measurement of liver size. This study was carried out to find the correlation of clinical and ultrasound measurement of liver size in various age groups and correlation of each with age, sex, height and weight.

Methods: 600 children from newborn to 12 years of age were included in the study. Using a structured proforma, baseline data, clinical liver span and ultrasound measurement of liver were documented.

Results: The mean (SD) liver span by clinical method was 5.6 (0.426) in the newborn period and it closely correlated with ultrasound measurement of 5.7 (0.375). The correlation existed in all the age group and was found to be significant. Liver span had significant correlation with height (r=0.89) and weight (r=0.86). It also had significant correlation with age (r=0.90). There was no significant correlation between sex and mean liver span. Multiple linear regression revealed that age, height and weight had significant influence on liver span with age being the most important factor.

Conclusion: Clinical estimates of liver span closely correlates with ultrasound measurements. Clinical methods should continue to be used for estimation of liver size.

Keywords: liver span, palpation, ultrasound.

References

  1. Riestra-Candelaria BL, Rodríguez-Mojica W, Vázquez-Quiñones LE, Jorge JC. Ultrasound Accuracy of Liver Length Measurement with Cadaveric Specimens. J Diagn Med Sonogr JDMS. 2016;32(1):12–9.
  2. Amatya P, Shah D, Gupta N, Bhatta NK. Clinical and ultrasonographic measure-ment of liver size in normal children. Indian J Pediatr. 2014 May;81(5):441–5.
  3. Megremis SD, Vlachonikolis IG, Tsilimigaki AM. Spleen length in childhood with US: normal values based on age, sex, and somatometric parameters. Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):129–34.
  4. Michael Glynn, William M Drake. Hutchison’s Clinical Methods. 24th ed. Elsevier;
  5. Rosenberg HK, Markowitz RI, Kolberg H, Park C, Hubbard A, Bellah RD. Normal splenic size in infants and children: sonographic measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Jul;157(1):119–21.
  6. Carol M. Rumack, Stephanie R. Wilson, J. William Charboneau, Deborah Levine. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 4th ed. ELSEVIER;
  7. James S. Dooley, Anna Lok, Andrew K. Burroughs, Jenny Heathcote. Sherlock’s Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System. 12th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 792 p.
  8. Wolf DC. Evaluation of the Size, Shape, and Consistency of the Liver. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations [Internet]. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworths; 1990. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go-v/books/NBK421/
  9. Lawson EE, Grand RJ, Neff RK, Cohen LF. Clinical Estimation of Liver Span in Infants and Children. Am J Dis Child. 1978 May 1;132(5):474–6.
  10. Naveh Y, Berant M. Assessment of liver size in normal infants and children. J PediatrGastroenterolNutr. 1984 Jun;3(3):346–8.
  11. Robert M. Kliegman. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 20th ed. ELSEVIER;
  12. Zoli M, Magalotti D, Grimaldi M, Gueli C, Marchesini G, Pisi E. Physical exami-nation of the liver: is it still worth it? Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Sep;90(9):1428–32.
  13. Kratzer W, Fritz V, Mason RA, Haenle MM, Kaechele V, Roemerstein Study Group. Factors Affecting Liver Size. J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Nov 1;22(11):1155–61.
  14. Naylor CD. The rational clinical examin-ation. Physical examination of the liver. JAMA. 1994 Jun 15;271(23):1859–65.
  15. Skrainka B, Stahlhut J, Fulbeck CL, Knight F, Holmes RA, Butt JH. Measuring liver span. Bedside examination versus ultrasound and scintiscan. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Jun;8(3 Pt 1):267–70.
  16. Chen CM, Wang JJ. Clinical and sonographic assessment of liver size in normal Chinese neonates. ActaPaediatr Oslo Nor 1992. 1993 Apr;82(4):345–7.
  17. DeLand FH, North WA. Relationship between liver size and body size. Radiology. 1968 Dec;91(6):1195–8.
  18. Castell DO. Estimation of Liver Size by Percussion in Normal Individuals. Ann Intern Med. 1969 Jun 1;70(6):1183.
  19. Safak AA, Simsek E, Bahcebasi T. Sonographic assessment of the normal limits and percentile curves of liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in healthy school-aged children. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2005 Oct;24(10):1359–64.
  20. Konuş OL, Ozdemir A, Akkaya A, Erbaş G, Celik H, Işik S. Normal liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in neonates, infants, and children: evaluation with sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Dec 1;171(6):1693–8.

Corresponding Author

Dr Karthick AR

Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics,

Govt. Vellore Medical College, Vellore,

Ph: 9884201751, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.