Details
Category: Volume 05 Issue 08 August 2017
Hits: 2028

Title: Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Intracranial Tumors: A Prospective Study in A Tertiary Hospital

Authors: Dr Shivani Gogi, Dr Veena, Dr Anil, Dr Shanthi Sree, Dr Mounika

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.19

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: 1. Diagnosis of intra cranial neoplasm on MRI. 2. To accurately determine the lesion characteristics.

Summary: In the present study for a period of 2 years (2015 – 2017) 130 cases from age group of 5-65 years suspected to be intracranial mass lesion on CT brain were elevated with MRI using various sequences and showed various supra and infratentorial and extra / intra axial cranial tumors.

Conclusion:

  1. Accuracy of predicting diagnosis of extra axial lesions is better than that of intra-axial lesion on MRI with 100% correlation with HPE in extra axial mass lesions
  2. Most of MR diagnosis correlated with histopathogical diagnosis.
  3. MRI is better in interpreting certain pathologies like infarction /reactive gliosis which produce similar morphological appearance to primary brain neoplasm on CT.

Keywords: MRI, intra axial; extra axial neoplasm, supratentorial, infratentorial tumors.

References

  1. Okamoto K, Furusawa T, Ishikawa K, Quadery FA, Sasai K and Tokiguchi S. Mimics of Brain Tumour on Neuro imaging: Part I. Radiation Medicine .2004;22(2):63-76.
  2. Khanna PC, Godinho S, Patkar Dp, Pungarkar SA, Lawaide MA,MR spectroscopy Aided Differentiation: “giant” extra axial Tuberculoma Masque-rading As Meningioma.AJNR 2006;27(7): 1438-1440.
  3. Atlas SW, Lavi E, Fisher PG: Intra axial brain tumors. In Atlas SW (ed): Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine , 3rd ed, Philadelphia , Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002, pp 565-693.
  4. Atlas SW, Lavi E, Goldberg HI: Extra axial brain tumors. In Atlas SW (ed): Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine 3rd ed, Philadelphia , Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002, pp 695-772.
  5. Brant –Zawadzki M, Norman D, Newton TH, et al: Magnetic resonance of the brain : The optimal screening technique. Radiology 152:71-77, 1984.
  6. Kramer ED, Rafto S, Packer RJ, et al: Comparison of myelography with computed tomography follow-up   gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging for subarachnoid metastatic disease of children. Neurology 41 : 46-50 , 1991.
  7. Ricci PE: Imaging of adult brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin North AM 9:651-669,1999.
  8. Kelly WM, Brant – Zawadzki M: M agnatic resonance imaging and computed tomography of supratentorial tumors. In Taveras JM, Ferrucci JT (eds): Radiology – Diagnosis, imaging, intervention, vol 3. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1986, pp1-21.
  9. Smirniotopoulos JG: The new WHO classification of brain tumors. Neuro-imaging Clin North Am 9:595-613,1999.
  10. Daumas – Duport C, Pietsch T, Lantos PL: Dysembryoplastic neuro epithelial tumor.In Kleihues P, Cavenee WK (eds): Pathology and Genetics of tumours of the Nervous System. Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2000, pp 103-106.
  11. Earnest F IV, Kelly PJ. Scheithauer BW,et al: Cerebral astrocytomas: Histopatho-logical correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 166:823-827, 1998.
  12. Kucharczyk W, Kelly WM, Chuang SH, et, al: The brain. In Kucharczyk W (ed): MRI: central nervous system, Philadel-phia, JB Lippincott, 1990, pp 1. 1-1.78.
  13. Leeds NE, Elkin CM, Zimmerman rd: Glioma of the brain Semin Roentgenol 19:27-43. 1984.
  14. Cha S, Lupo JM, Chen MH, Lamborn KR, Mc Dermott MW, Berger MS, Nelson SJ and Dillon WP. Differentiation of Glioblastoma mutiforme from single brain metastases By Peak height & percentage of signal intensity recovery derived From Dynamic susceptibility Weighted Contrast Enhanced perfusion MR Imaging . American Journal of Neuroradiology 2007 July; 28: 1078-1084.

Corresponding Author

Dr Veena

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.