Title: A Study of the Correlation between Pre-Operative Risk Factors and Various Complications Occurring during and after Laparoscopic Procedures

Authors: Dr A Mitra, Dr U Chandak, Dr Mrunmayee Dabholkar, Dr Adarsh Lalwani, Dr Dhara Pandya

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.16

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgeries have experienced a boom since the 1990’s. The benefits of laparoscopic approach were so readily apparent that laparoscopic procedures soon became the standard of care without any randomized controlled trials comparing it to the previous gold standard procedures (e.g. Cholecystectomy). Laparoscopy by definition is minimally invasive surgical approach which is being used in many minor and major surgeries. The significant advantages seen in laparoscopic surgeries are minimal blood loss, reduced hospital stay, less post-operative pain, disability and quicker recovery as compared to open surgeries. As more and more surgeries are being done laparoscopically the incidence and magnitude of complications is also expected to increase. It is of crucial importance that the complications associated with laparoscopic surgeries be identified in time to prevent serious patient sequelae and morbidity. A complication is defined as a new problem or illness that makes the treatment of a previous or pre-existing condition more difficult. Complications of laparoscopic procedures can be broadly divided as general complications of laparoscopy and complications specific to the procedure itself. With this background knowledge from the literature we conducted this study to evaluate various complications which occur during and after laparoscopic procedures and to find a correlation between complications and pre-existing risk factors.

Aims and Objectives: (1) To study, the correlation between pre-operative risk factors and various complications occurring during and after laparoscopic procedures. (2) To study the incidence and enumerate various complications occurring during intra-operative and post-operative period in laparoscopic procedures (3) To classify various complications occurring based on the different steps and different procedures. (4) To study the correlation between various pre-operative risk factors and the different complications occurring in laparoscopic procedures.

Materials and Methods: This study was conducted after getting approval from institutional ethical committee. This was a prospective cohort study comprising of 600 patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures at a tertiary care centre over a period of 2 years. The patients undergoing basic laparoscopic procedures as well as advanced laparoscopic techniques were included in this study depending upon defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We focused on the type of complications in relation to the procedure and the time of occurrence. The inpatient and outpatient visits of every patient were followed up, to assess intra-operative and post- operative complications. Procedures were classified as basic laparoscopic procedures (cholecystectomy, appendectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, IPOM, and hernia surgeries) and advanced laparoscopic procedures (abdomino-perineal resection, gastrectomy, anterior resection, nephrectomy, splenectomy, esophagectomy, metabolic surgery, CBD explorations and pyelolithotomy).complications were evaluated and listed according to specific procedures and grouped with respect to the surgical step during laparoscopy to distinguish access trauma (trocar related injuries), dissection trauma (injury during dissection) associated trauma (hypercarbia, hypotension, pulmonary embolism) and wound related complications.

Results: Out of 600 studied cases 310 (51.67%) were males and 290 (48.33%) were females with a m:f ratio of 1:0.93 . Most common age group of the patients was between 41-50 (23%) years followed by 31-40 (19.17%) years and 21-30 (18.83%) years. Complications were seen in 41 (6.83%) patients. Analysis of preoperative risk factors revealed that anemia was present in 184 (30.7%) patients while hypoprotinemia was present in 101 (16.8%) patients. Diabetes was found to be present in 16 (2.7%) patients. The cases were divided into ASA scores. 567 (94.5%) patients belonged to ASA I while 27 (4.5%) and 6 (1%) patients belonged to ASA II and III respectively. The duration of surgery was found to be less than 2 hours in 201 (33.5%) patients while the duration was 2-6 hours and more than 6 hours in 384 (64%) and 15 (2.5%) patients respectively. The complications found in basic laparoscopic procedures were most common in diagnostic laparoscopies (8.69%) followed by hernia repair (8.51%) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (5.52%). The overall complication rate seen in basic laparoscopic procedures was found to be 5.59%. In advanced laparoscopic procedures the highest complication rate was seen with miscellaneous procedures (23.5%) followed by laparoscopic combined procedures (20%) and colorectal surgeries (9.52%). The most common complications seen were wound infections/healing (2.16%) followed by visceral injuries (1.66%) and miscellaneous complications (1.66%) less common complications included vascular and access related injuries (0.33% each). Most complications (4.5%) occurred during early post-operative period (up to 6 weeks) followed by during late post operative period (1.33%) and intra-operative period (1%). Mortality was low (0.33%) that too was seen in patients suffering from malignant diseases.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgeries have a definite advantage over conventional surgeries. The main advantages include low rate of post-operative infections, less blood loss, short hospital stay and reduced morbidity. Our study concludes that most of the benign and malignant intra-abdominal pathologies can be safely dealt by laparoscopy with acceptable complication rates. Rational selection of patients, experienced surgeons, proper pre-operative work up and a low threshold for conversion will further reduce the incidence of complications.

Keyword: laparoscopic surgeries, complications, pre-operative risk factors, outcome. 

References

  1. Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F. History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med. 2000 Mar;42(1):87-90.
  2. Lasser MS, Ghavamian R. Surgical complications of laparoscopic urological surgery. Arab Journal of Urology. 2012;10(1):81-88.
  3. Karthik S, Augustine AJ, Shibumon MM, Pai MV. Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: A descriptive study. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2013;9(2):59-64.
  4. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, et al. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1996;224:609–20.
  5. Srivastava A, Niranjan A. Secrets of safe laparoscopic surgery: Anaesthetic and surgical considerations. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2010;6(4):91-94.
  6. Cunningham AJ. Anesthetic implications of laparoscopic surgery. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 1998;71(6):551-578.
  7. Joris J L, Chiche J -D, Canivet J -L M, Jacquet N J, Legros J J Y, Lamy M L. Hemodyna-mic changes induced by laparoscopic and their endocrine correlates: effects of clonidine. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1998);32(5):1389–1396
  8. Jansen F W, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos J B. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynecol. (1997);104:595–600.
  9. Patel M I, Hardman D T A, Nicholls D, Fisher C M, Appleberg M. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Med J Austral. (1996);164:652–656.
  10. Cuschieiri A, Dubois F, Mouriel J et al the european experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 161: 385-387
  11. Strasberg SM, Sanabria JR, Clavien PA. complications of laparoscopic cholecyst-ectomy Can J Surg 1992; 35: 275-280
  12. Gupta R, Sample C, Bamehriz F, Birch DW. Infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg. 2006 Dec;49(6):397-400.
  13. Leibl B J, Schmedt C G, Schwarz J, Daubler P, Kraft K, Schlossnickel B, Bittner R. A single institution's experience with transperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg. (1998);175(6):446–451.
  14. McCormack Æ B. L. Wake Æ C. Fraser Æ L. ValeJ. Perez Æ A. Grant Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review, Hernia (2005) 9:109-114.
  15. Roberts D G, S. Anwar. Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Repair of Abdominal Incisional and Ventral Hernias wth PolyvinylideneFluoride-Coated Polypropylene Mesh; A Retrospective Study with Short to Medium Term Results. Science Journal of Clinical Medicine.Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp. 10-14.
  16. Palanivelu C, textbook of surgical laparoscopy, 2002.
  17. Seven R, Barbaros U, Asoglu O, The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study. Hernia. 2007;11:51-56.
  18. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparoscopic Endosc 1993; 3: 39– 41.
  19. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg242:83–91
  20. Leggett P L, Churchman-Winn R, Ahn C. Resolving gastroesophageal reflux with laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc. (1998);12:142–147. 
  21. Peters J H, DeMeester T R, Crookes P, Oberg S, de Vos Shoop M, Hagan J A, Bremner C G. The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg. (1998);228(1):40–50. 
  22. Viljakka M T, Luostarinen M E, Isolauri J O. Complications of open and laparoscopic antireflux surgery: 32-year audit at a teaching hospital. J Am Coll Surg. (1997);185:446–450.
  23. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Postoperative complications of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:119-122.
  24. Holeczy P, Danis J. laparoscopic transgastric pancreatic pseudocysto-gastrostomy—first experience with extraluminal approach. Hepatogastroent-erology 1998;45: 2115-18
  25. Rassweiler, J., Fornara, P., Weber, M., Janetschek, G.,Fahlenkamp, D., Henkel, T., Beer, M., Stackl, W., Boeckmann,W., Recker, F., Lampel, A., Fischer, C., Humke, U. and Miller,K.: Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of the laparoscopic working group of the German Urological Association.J. Urol., 160: 18, 1998.

Corresponding Author

Dr U Chandak

Associate Professor, Dept of Surgery,

Government Medical College and Hospital Nagpur (MS) India