Title: Differences of Radiographic Quality and Exposure Index on Computed Radiography Using Imaging Plate with Different Reading Time Period

Authors: Dartini, Ary Kurniawati, Andrey Nino Kurniawan, Sugiyanto, Fatimah, M. Irwan Katili

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i6.143

Abstract

Introduction: Computed Radiography (CR) is the process of digitizing images using photostimulable plate to acquire image. The energy stored in the imaging plate disappears over the time, so imaging plate should be read as soon as possible to avoid the loss of image information.

Objective: This study aimed at determining the profile of Exposure Index (EI), radiographic density and contrast on radiographs produced using CR with various reading time: 0 hours (without a break), 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 hours after exposure.

Methods: The type of research is observational study with cross-sectional design where  data were collected by survey and analyzed using descriptive analysis.

Result: The results showed that the profile of the exposure index (EI) value decreased irregularly. The average value of the highest and lowest EI on each object were 1394.33 and 1127.67 (cranium), 1871.33 and 1573.33 (elbow joint), while the largest percentage of degradation was at 22-hour reading time.

Conclusion: The profile of radiographic density and contrast values varied at each lag time. The highest contrast were 1.24 (cranium) and 0.40 (elbow joint) that resulted at 0 hours lag time, whereas the lowest contrast value where 0.81 (cranium) and 0.34 (elbow joint) that resulted at 16 hours lag time. The image contrast was still editable till 10 hours lag time (cranium) and 12 hours lag time (elbow joint).

Keywords: exposure index, computed radiography, radiographic quality.

References

1.      Ballinger, P.W, 2003, Radiographic Positions and Radiologic Prosedures, Mosby Inc., Missouri..

2.      Bushong, Steward C. 2001. Radiographic Science For Technologist Physics,Biology, and Protection. Amerika Serikat : Mosby inc.

3.      Carlton, Ricard R, and Adler, Arlene M. 2001. Principles of Radiographic Imagin : An Art and A Science. Amerika Serikat : Delman

4.      Carter,C, Veale,B. 2010. Digital Radiography and PACS. Mosby Missouri.

5.      C. Cristi, Digital Radiography and PACS, Mosby Elseiver, St. Louis, Missouri, 2010

6.      Papp, Jefray. 2006. Quality Management in the Imaging Science. United States of America.

Corresponding Author

Dartini, Ary Kurniawati

Politeknik Kesehatan,  Kemenkes Semarang,

Jl. Tirto Agung Pedalangan, Banyumanik, Semarang 50239, Indonesia

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.