Title: Role of C Reactive Protein and WBC Count in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis and Its Predictive Value in Assessing the Severity of the Disease
Authors: Dr W Edwina Vasantha M.S, Dr A Muthuvinayagam M.S, Dr K.Sugumaran, Dr S.Narayanan
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i5.198
Abstract
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is still one of the commonest surgical emergencies. The diagnosis is primarily clinical based on the typical presentation of right lower quadrant pain, nausea and vomiting with tenderness and guarding in right iliac fossa. The clinical experience of the surgeon decides the accuracy of the diagnosis which is difficult in 30 – 40% of cases despite available diagnostic modalities. Apart from a careful history and clinical examination, blood inflammatory markers also help in the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. Various inflammatory markers have been estimated like white cell count, C Reactive Protein and polymorph percentage. This study is conducted to estimate the role of sensitivity and specificity of total white cell count and C Reactive Protein in patients clinically diagnosed as suffering from acute appendicitis and their correlation with histopathology reports to assess their role in diagnosing complicated acute appendicitis.
Materials and Methods: Patients admitted with clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis to department of general surgery, Thanjavur Medical College & Hospital, Thanjavur during January 2016 to January 2017 were included in the study. Clinical examination was made and the signs and symptoms were recorded in the proforma. Patients presenting with appendicular mass or abscess, treated conservatively and patients who refused to give consent were excluded from this study. Blood samples were collected on admission before surgery for estimation of total WBC count and CRP estimation. Then the patients underwent appendicectomy and the resected appendicular specimens were sent for histopathological examination and the results were collected. Based on the histopathological report the cases were grouped under two categories complicated acute appendicitis and uncomplicated acute appendicitis depending on the presence or absence of perforation and gangrenous changes. Then the data were entered into excel 2007 and statistical analysis were made to find the significance of total white cell count and C reactive protein values in diagnosing acute appendicitis and their correlation with complication like perforation or gangrenous changes.
Observation: The total number of study subjects participated was 150 cases and among them 43 cases were complicated acute appendicitis and 107 cases were uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The age distribution was 71 cases (46.5%) were less than 25 years and 79 cases (53.5%) were 25 years and above. Out of the 150 cases 106 (70.7%) were males and 44 (29.3%) were females making a ratio of 2.4: 1. Right iliac fossa pain and tenderness and Mc Burney’s tenderness were present in all 150 cases (100%) while migratory pain was noticed only in 76 cases (50.7%). Guarding and rigidity were seen in 67 cases (44.7%). C reactive protein was positive in 119 cases (79.3%) and negative in 31 cases (20.7%). In complicated acute appendicitis C reactive protein values were > 25 mg/dl in 40 cases (93%) and only in 35 cases (32.7%) in uncomplicated acute appendicitis group. Total white cell count was >11150 cells/cmm in 33 cases (76.7%) in complicated acute appendicitis and in uncomplicated acute appendicitis 47 cases (43.9%) only and making a total of 80 cases (53.3%).
Keywords: Acute Appendicitis, C reactive protein, WBC count, histopathology.
References
1. Ortega-Deballon P, Ruiz deAdana-Belbel JC, Hernández-Matías A, García-Septiem J, Moreno-Azcoita M. Usefulness of laboratory data in the management of right iliac fossa pain in adults.Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:1093–9.
2. Khan MN, Davie E, Irshad K. The role of white cell count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2004;16:17–19.
3. Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmişer S. Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(12):1270–1274.
4. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis.ANZ J Surg 2006;76:71–4.
5. Khan MN, Davie E, Irshad K. The role of white cell count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2004;16:17–19.
6. H C Kim MD, D M Yang MD,C M Lee MD, W Jin MD, D H Nam MD,J Y Song MD, and J Y Kim MD Acute appendicitis: relationships between CT-determined severities and serum white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels. Br J Radiol. 2011 December; 84(1008): 1115–1120
7. Hyoung-Min Moon, Beom-Seok Park, and Duk-Jin Moon. Diagnostic Value of C-reactive Protein in Complicated Appendicitis . J Korean SocColoproctol. 2011 June; 27(3): 122–126.
8. Vargas HI, Averbook A, Stamos MJ: Appendiceal mass: Conservative therapy followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Am Surg60:753, 1994.
9. Haller JA, Shaker IJ, Donahoo JS, et al: Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children. Ann Surg177:595, 1973.
10. Sheikh MuzamilShafi, MisbhaAfsheen and FarooqA..Reshi Total Leucocyte Count, C-reactive Protein and Neutrophil Count: Diagnostic Aid in Acute Appendicitis Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009 April; 15(2): 117–120 .
11. Zimmerman MA, Selzman CH, Cothren C, Sorensen AC, Raeburn CD, Harken AH. Diagnostic implications of C - reactive protein. Arch Surg. 2003;138:220–4.
12. Eriksson S, Granstrom L. Laboratory tests in patients with suspected acute append-icitis. ActaChir Scand. 1994;155:117–2.
13. Shakhatreh HS. The accuracy of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with that of clinical diagnosis. Med Arh. 2000;54:109–10.
14. Rothrock SG, Pagane J Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36:39–51.