Title: Differentiation of Bacterial and Viral Pneumonia in Children by Hematological Investigations

Authors: Prabakar S, Ramanathan R, Hari Vasudevan S

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i5.95

Abstract

Objective: To differentiate bacterial and viral community acquired pneumonias using WBC count (TC), differential count (DC),erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR).

Design: Descriptive Study

Setting: Semi-Urban tertiary care hospital

Methods: 100 cases of children aged between 1month to 12 years who were admitted to paediatric wards with tachypnoea as per WHO criteria and chest in drawing in Rajah Muthiah Medical college, Chidambaram were included in the study. Detailed history, physical examinations were recorded in a proforma. Investigations included WBC count, DC, ESR, Chest X ray. Children who had radiologically confirmed pneumonia (86 cases) were divided in to bacterial and viral pneumonia based on their radiological findings. These results were correlated with laboratory findings and results were given.

Results: In the present study, radiological findings were present in 86% of cases. Bacterial pneumonia was detected in 73%, viral pneumonia in 13%. Among bacterial pneumonia, bronchopneumonia was seen in 34% cases, consolidation was seen in 26%, alveolar infiltrate in 6% and complications of pneumonia in 7% cases. In the present study, among bacterial pneumonias defined radiologically,63% had elevated WBC count ,79% had neutrophilia, 76.7% had elevated ESR. There was no correlation of laboratory findings with bacterial and viral pneumonia defined radiologically (low sensitivity and specificity).

Conclusion: Routine hematological investigations like WBC count, DC, ESR aid very little in differentiating bacterial and viral pneumonias. Chest X-ray is valuable aid in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children. Follow up chest roentgenogram is vital for evaluating the response to treatment in pneumonia.

Keywords: Pneumonia, Bacterial, Viral, WBC count, DC, ESR.

References

1.      Park K. Acute respiratory infections. In: Park’s text book of preventive and social medicine, 23rded. Jabalapur: M/s Banar-asidas Bhanot publishers; 2015.p. 167-74.

2.      Singh V, Aneja S. Pneumonia – manage-ment in the developing World. Pediatr Respir Rev 2011;12:52-59.

3.      Govt. of. India (2014),National health profile 2013, DGHS, Ministry of health and family welfare.

4.      Jain S, Williams DJ, Arnold SR, Ampofo K, Bramley AM et al for the CDC EPIC study team. Community-Acquired Pneum-onia Requiring  Hospitalization among U.S. Children N Engl J Med 2015; 372:835-45.

5.      Virkki R, Juven T, Rikalainen H, Svedstrom E, Mertsola J, Ruuskanen O. Differentiation of bacterial and viral pneumonia in children. Thorax 2002; 57:438-41.

6.      MacIntyre CR, McIntyre PB, Cagney M. Community-based estimates of incidence and risk factors for childhood pneumonia in western Sydney. Epidemiol Infect 2003; 131:1091-96.

7.      Heaton P, Arthur K. The utility of chest radiography in the follow up of pneumonia. N Z Med J 1998; 111:315-17.

8.      Don M, Valent F, Korppi M, Canciani M. Differentiation of bacterial and viral community acquired pneumonia in children.Pediatr Int. 2009 Feb;51(1):91-96.

9.      Hoshina T, Nainishi E, Kanno S, Nishio H, Kusuhara K et al.The utility of biomarkers in differentiating bacterial from non- bacterial lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized children: difference of the diagnostic performance between acute pneumonia and bronchitis.J Infect Chemother.2014 Oct;20(10):616-20.

10.  Korppi M et al.Non-specific host response markers in the differentiation between pneumococcal and viral pneumonia: what is the most accurate combination?.Pediatr Int. 2004 Oct;46(5):545-50.

11.  Drummond P, Clark J, Wheeler J, Gallo-way A, Freeman R, Cant A. Community acquired pneumonia-a prospective UK study. Arch Dis Child 2000; 83: 408-12.

Corresponding Author

Prabakar S

Postgraduate, Department of Pediatrics

Rajah Muthiah Medical College