Title: Fungal Keratitis – Epidemiology and Treatment Outcome - In North Costal Andhra Pradesh

Authors: Dr Veena. P, Dr Nasrin N, Dr Rashmi Rath

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i5.43

Abstract

Purpose: To review the distribution, current trends, and response  patterns for treatment of fungal keratitis isolates in costal districts over the last 2 years

Methods

Design: Retrospective, observational, case series.

Participants: Microbiology records of suspected  fungal  keratitis cases that underwent a diagnostic corneal scraping and cultures from March 1,2010,  through April 31, 2012,at sankar foundation eye hospital, teritiary eye care and referral center, were reviewed. Culture results and medical and surgical management response were reviewed and analyzed.

Results:  A total of 450corneal scrapings were taken during the 2years of the study.  Pathogen was recovered in 380 samples (84.4%), with fungal keratitis accounting for 350 of the positive cultures (81.5%). Asperigillus 48.15%, Fusarium 43.15%, Yeast 0.2%, Paecillomysis0.52%, and Acremonium 0.52%, not able to grow in 7.63%. Out of 380 cases 315 cases responded for topical antifungals, 75 cases with deep infiltrates and endoexudates resistant to topical medication alone, 33cases posted for  TPK , 42cases treated with intracameral Ampho-B 10-15 u and intrastromal  7.5microns at least 2-3 times along with oral anti fungals.

Conclusions:  1. About 90%  h/o of injury with vegetable matter,2.Pts who presented early are responded very well with Natamycin 5%e/d and Fluconazole e/d along with repeated superficial debridement . If not responding addition of Amphotericin B 0.2%e/d hrly is with good results, 3.Deep infiltrates and endoexudate cases those who were given intracameral and intra stromal along with oral azoles doing well than TPK patients after optical PKP. 6. Topical Voriconazole 20% e/d (aurolab) did not give any added advantage except in few cases. 7.Pts on  steroids were refractory to maximum medical treatment ultimately going for surgical intervention.

Keywords: fungal keratitis, asperigillous, natamycin, vozole, intracameral Ampho-B, deep keratitis, TPK.

References

1.      Xie L, Dong X, Shi W,Treatment of fungal keratitis by penetrating keratoplasty, British Journal of Ophthalmology 2001;85:1070-1074

2.      Gopinathan, etal Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2013 Sep 1; 7(3): 209–218. Published online 2013 Jul 11. doi:  10.1007/s12281-013-0150-110.1007/s12281-013-0150-1,.Cornea: August 2002 - Volume 21 - Issue 6 - pp 555-559

3.      Sirikul T, Prabriputaloong T, Smathivat A, Chuck RS, Vongthongsri A. Predisposing factors and etiologic diagnosis of ulcerative keratitis. Cornea. 2008;27:283–287. [PubMed]

4.      Srinivasan M, Gonzales CA, George C, et al. Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81: 965–971. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

5.      Rosa RH, Jr, Miller D, Alfonso EC. The changing spectrum of fungal keratitis in south Florida. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1005–1013. [PubMed]

6.      Tanure MA, Cohen EJ, Sudesh S, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR. Spectrum of fungal keratitis at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cornea. 2000;19:307–312. [PubMed]

7.      Xie L, Zhai H, Zhao J, Sun S, Shi W, Dong X. Antifungal susceptibility for common pathogens of fungal keratitis in Shandong Province, China. Am J Ophthalmol.2008;146:260–265. [PubMed]

8.      Khairallah SH, Byrne KA, Tabbara KF. Fungal keratitis in Saudi Arabia. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;79:269–276. [PubMed]

9.      Bhartiya P, Daniell M, Constantinou M, Islam FM, Taylor HR. Fungal keratitis in Melbourne. Clin Experiment Ophthalm-ology. 2007;35:124–130. [PubMed]

10.  Thomas PA. Current perspectives on ophthalmic mycoses. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003; 16: 730797.

11.  P. A. Thomas  12 January 2013 Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 210–220.

Corresponding Author

Dr Veena. P

Asst. Prof. of Ophthalmology

GIMSR, Gitam University, Visakhapatnam