Title: A Study on Comparison between Open Preperitoneal Mesh Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernia

Authors: Dr Malaya Krishna Nayak, Dr Ashok Kumar Nayak, Dr Anshuman Pradhan, Dr Balabhadra Samantaray, Dr Dharbind Kumar Jha

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i5.04

Abstract

Background: Lichtenstein hernioplasty is now standard surgery for inguinal hernia repair. The aim of the study was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of the open preperitoneal mesh repair with the Lichtenstein mesh technique repair for inguinal hernia which could be a better option.

Methods: 203 consecutive patients with inguinal hernia were randomized (according to a random table) to undergo either a open preperitoneal or a Lichtenstein repair under anesthesia. Early outcome measures duration of surgery, postoperative complications. Early complications like wound pain, wound infection,. Late complications like pain and recurrence.

Time to return to work and full activity.

Results: In our study we found that though the operative time in open preperitoneal mesh repair is longer than the conventional Lichtenstein mesh repair the post operative pain, infection, duration of hospital stay and recurrence rate is less.

Conclusions: In conclusion we recommend open preperitoneal repair in inguinal hernia in place of Lichtenstein repair. The use of open preperitoneal hernia repair for inguinal hernia is safe, post operative pain and recurrence rate is minimal.

Keywords: Inguinal hernia, preperitoneal mesh repair, Lichtenstein mesh repair.

References

1.      Read RC (1984) The development of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg Clin North Am 64:185–196

2.      Read RC (1997) Annandale_s role in the development of preperitoneal groin herniorrhaphy. Hernia 1:111–115

3.      Read RC (1999) Francis C Usher: the herniologist of the twentieth century. Hernia 3:57–61

4.      Read RC (2003) Recent advances in the repair of groin herniation. Curr Probl Surg 40:1–80.

5.      Stoppa RE (1995) Errors, difficulties, and complications in hernia repairs using the GPRVS. Probl Gen Surg 12:139–148

6.      Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle LL Jr (1958) Use of Marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias. Am Surg 24:969–974

7.      Lichtenstein IG, Shulman AG (1986) Ambulatory (outpatient) hernia surgery including a new concept: introducing tensionfree repair. Int Surg 71:1–4.

Corresponding Author

Dr Dharbind Kumar Jha

Junior Resident (Academic)

Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Vimsar, Burla, Odisha, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Contact number 8763090706