Title: Ponseti’s Method: Is It Effective in Conservative Management of Neglected Congenital Talipes Equino Varus

Authors: Dr Arun Kumar Seshadrinath N, Dr Sabarisree Manikantan

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i4.220

Abstract

Background: Clubfoot should be ideally corrected in infancy. Developing nations have inadequate medical and surgical resources. The cost of managing clubfoot surgically and the associated crippling deformities in later life makes conservative management a coveted means in developing. There are no guidelines in management of neglected clubfoot and the upper limit for age is yet to be determined.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Ponseti’s method of conservative Management of Congenital Talipes Equino Varus in neglected clubfoot.

Settings and Design: This Prospective study was executed in the out-patient department & was conducted as a non-randomized prospective interventional analysis.

Methods and Material: All children in the weight bearing age group between 8 months to 16 years having Idiopathic Congenital Talipes Equino Varus, both unilateral and bilateral were included in the study. Altogether there were 37 patients amounting to a total of 61 clubfeet. They were all managed by Ponseti's method of casting. All the patients were compulsorily evaluated for 1.5 years and the evaluation was continued to the maximum possible until the tenure of the study. Children with clubfeet above the age of 16 years and below the age of weight bearing, those with teratologic clubfoot, those with syndromic associations and Recurrent or relapsed clubfeet consequent to failed surgical treatment were excluded from the study. Their pre-treatment Pirani score was noted and the scoring was done on every subsequent visits. The end point was a score <= 1.5 with the feet having 300-400 of external rotation and 150 of dorsiflexion.

Statistical analysis used: The means of Pre-treatment Pirani score was compared with the mean of Post-treatment Pirani score using paired t test. Linear Regression and correlation was used to analyse the number of casts required based on the age of the patient and Pre-treatment Pirani score

Results: 44 clubfeet were able to achieve the end point with Ponseti’s protocol. There was a significant (p<0.001) change in the mean pre-treatment and post treatment Pirani score. There was a strong correlation between the severity scoring and the number of casts needed and a weaker correlation between the age and the number of casts needed. The overall complications included equinus relapse, rigid equinus, skin erythema, knee rigidity and anaesthetic complication.

Conclusions: Ponseti’s method is definitely an effective method in neglected clubfoot deformity. Even in stiff clubfeet it has its use as initial management. We were able to correct 72% of the clubfeet and in the rest, Ponseti’s method helped in reducing the amount of deformity.

Keywords-Neglected, Resistant and complex clubfoot; plantigrade foot, prolonged casting, Pirani’s score.

References

1.      Jose A. Morcuende, MD,PhD, Lori A. Dolan, PhD(C), Frederick R. Dietz, MD and Ignacio V.Ponseti, MD “Radical reduction in the Rate of Extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti Method” Pediatrics Vol 113 No.2 February 2004, pp.376-380

2.      Cooper DM, Dietz FR. “Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: a thirty year follow-up note.” J Bone Joint Surg (Am)1995; 77:1477-89

3.      Colburn M, Williams M. “Evaluation of the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by using the Ponseti method.” J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003,42(5):259-67

4.      Chotel F, Parot R, Durand JM, Garnier E, Hodgkinson I, Berard J. “initial management of congenital varus equinus clubfoot by Ponseti’s method”. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002;88(7):710-70

5.      Ippolito, L. Fraracci, P. Fararacci, P. Farsetti and F. De Maio: “Validity of the Anteroposterior Talocalcaneal Angle to assess Congenital Clubfoot Correction”

6.      Herzenberg, JE, et al. “Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot.” Clin Orthop. 2002;22:517-521.

7.      Bor N, Herzenberg JE, Frick SL. “Ponseti management of clubfoot in older infants”. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:224–228.

8.      Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. “Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:986–996.

9.      Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, Walton T, Porter KR, Gurnett CA. “Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:22–27

10.  Dyer PJ, Davis N. “The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management ofclub foot by the Ponseti method”. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1082–1084.

11.  Eberhardt O, Schelling K, Parsch K, Wirth T. “Treatment of congenital clubfoot with the Ponseti method”. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006;144:497–501.

12.  Garg S, Dobbs MB. “Use of the Ponseti method for recurrent clubfoot following posteromedial release”. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42:68–72.

13.  Goksan SB. “Treatment of congenital clubfoot with the Ponseti method”. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2002;36:281–287.

14.  Goksan SB, Bursali A, Bilgili F, Sivacioglu S, Ayanoglu S. “Ponseti technique for the correction of idiopathic clubfeet presenting up to 1 year of age. A preliminary study in children with untreated or complex deformities”. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:15–21.

15.  Gupta A, Singh S, Patel P, Patel J, Varshney MK. Evaluation of the utility of the Ponseti method of correction of clubfoot deformity in a developing nation. Int Orthop. 2008;32:75–79.

16.  Morcuende JA, Abbasi D, Dolan LA, Ponseti IV. “Results of an accelerated Ponseti protocol for clubfoot”. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:623–626.

17.  Tindall AJ, Steinlechner CWB, Lavy CBD, Mannion S, Mkandawire N. “Results of manipulation of idiopathic clubfoot deformity in Malawi by orthopaedic clinical officers using the Ponseti method: a realistic alternative for the developing world?” J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:627–629.

18.  Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA. “Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method”. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:378-81.

19.  Khan SA, Kumar A. “Ponseti's manipulation in neglected clubfoot in children more than 7 years of age: a prospective evaluation of 25 feet with long-term follow-up”. J Pediatr Orthop B 2010;19:385–389

20.  Spiegel DA, Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, et al. “Ponseti method for untreated idiopathic clubfeet in Nepalese patients from 1 to 6 years of age”. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1164–1170

21.  Ajai Singh, “Evaluation of Neglected Idiopathic Ctev Managed by Ligamentotaxis Using Jess: A Long-Term Followup,” Advances in Orthopedics, vol. 2011, Article ID 218489, 6 pages, 2011. doi:10.4061/2011/218489

22.  Thacker MM, Scher DM, Sala DA, van Bosse HJ, Feldman DS, Lehman WB. “Use of the foot abduction orthosis following Ponseti casts: is it essential?” J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:225–228

23.  Segev E, Keret D, Lokiec F, Yavor A, Wientraub S, Ezra E, Hayek S. Early “experience with the Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot”. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7:307–310.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sabarisree Manikantan

Associate Professor (CAP), Dept of Orthopaedics

Govt Medical college, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.