Title: Epidemiological Analysis and Clinical Characteristics of Traumatic Brain Injury in Southern Rajasthan: A Hospital Based Study

Authors: Govind Mangal, Uday Bhaumik

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i4.218

Abstract

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury, also known as intracranial injury is a significant public health problem and also a major leading cause of disability and mortality in all regions of the globe despite advancement in prevention and treatments.

Aims: To describe and evaluate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Traumatic Brain Injury patients and their clinical outcomes

Methodology: A hospital based Retrospective, cross-sectional study analysis of 900 patients diagnosed with Traumatic Brain Injury admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur from 1st November 2015 - 31st October 2016. Review of  medical records of patients was done and data was collected according  age, sex, mechanism of injury, severity of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Glasgow Coma Outcome (GOS) score, Computed Tomography (CT) scan results, modality of management and type of surgical intervention and outcome. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.

Results: Among the study subjects of 900 patients of TBI, majority were in age group of 20-29 (36.33%) years followed by 30-39 (26.11%) years and average (median) age of patients found to be 31 years. The most common mechanism of injury was road traffic accidents 70%. Clinical examination revealed that as a sign and symptom, 90.22% patients experienced loss of consciousness and 42.22% had one or more episodes of vomiting and 14.22% had abnormal motor response followed by 13.11% with abnormal pupils. Contusions (44.44%) and fractures (36.22%) were the most common findings revealed by CT scan. Thus CT scan revealed abnormal finding in about 86% patients and out of these patients 28% patients undergone for surgery and remaining was treated conservatively. In our study, patients were classified by GCS as mild TBI in 47.11%, moderate in 36.89% and severe in 16% patients. The overall mortality was 9%. In a 6 month follow-up, 3% patients were persistently vegetative, 1.78% was severely disabled and 1.22% was moderately disabled. Good recovery was seen in 85% patients.

Conclusion: In India, status of TBI suffers from several gaps which need to be bridged through implementing more basic, epidemiological, clinical and translational research in this field in the future.

Keywords: TBI, Epidemiology, Clinical, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Mortality. 

References

1.      Chiu WT, Huang SJ, Tsai SH, Lin JW, Tsai MD, Lin TJ, et al. The impact of time, legislation, and geography on the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14:930-5.     

2.      Leonhard MJ, Wright DA, Fu R, Lehrfeld DP, Carlson KF. Urban/rural disparities in oregon pediatric traumatic brain injury. Inj Epidemiol 2015; 2:32.  

3.      Sharda P, Haspani S, Idris Z. Factors prognosticating the outcome of decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury: A Malaysian experience. Asian J Neurosurg 2014;9:203-12.

4.      Maier D, Njoku I Jr., Schmutzhard E, Dharsee J, Doppler M, Härtl R, et al. Traumatic brain injury in a rural and an urban Tanzanian hospital - a comparative, retrospective analysis based on computed tomography. World Neurosurg 2014; 81:478-82.   

5.      Feigin VL, Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Starkey NJ, McPherson K, Kahan M, et al. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: A population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12:53-64.      

6.      Pruthi N, Ashok M, Kumar VS, Jhavar K, Sampath S, Devi BI. Magnitude of pedestrian head injuries and fatalities in Bangalore, south India: A retrospective study from an apex neurotrauma center. Indian J Med Res 2012;136:1039-43.

7.      Fleminger S, Ponsford J. Long term outcome after traumatic brain injury. BMJ. 2005; 331:1419–20.

8.      Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1996. Global health statistics: A compendium of incidence prevalence and mortality estimates for over 200 conditions.

9.      Lopez AD, Murray CJ. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1996. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020.

10.  Gururaj G. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries: Indian scenario. Neurol Res. 2002; 24:24–8.

11.  Mushhkudiani NA, Engel DC, Sterberg EW, Butcher I et al. Prognostic values of Demographic Characteristics in Traumatic Brain Injury:Results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24:259-69.

12.  Goyal MK, Verma R, Kochar SR & Asawa SS. (2010). Correlation of CT scan with postmortem findings of acute head trauma cases at SMS Hospital, Jaipur

13.  Pathak A, Desania NL & Verma R.(2008).Profile of road traffic accidents & head injury in Jaipur(Rajasthan)

14.  Mock C. Improving pre-hospital trauma care in rural areas of low income countries. J Trauma.2003; 54:1197-8.

Corresponding Author

Govind Mangal

Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery

Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur