Title: Imaging of Adrenal Tumors Using CT: Comparison of Benign and Malignant Lesions

Authors: Usha Kumari Kunjuraman, Sara Ammu Chacko

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i4.103

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to see the CT features that most significantly useful to differentiate benign and malignant lesions of adrenal gland

Materials and Method: A retrospective analysis of CT of 35 patients with adrenal masses was done. Features such as size, margins, heterogeneous or homogeneous appearance, calcification, fatty attenuation, contrast enhancement patterns were assessed. Pathological and clinical diagnosis including biochemical parameters were obtained from the medical records library to make a final diagnosis.

Results: Size, irregular margins and heterogeneous enhancement pattern were found to be important discriminators for malignant from benign lesions.

Conclusion: Though the majority of tumors has similar appearances and cannot be characterized beyond size and location, CT criteria can often discriminate accurately between benign and malignant adrenal masses and, in particular, minimize the number of false-negative diagnoses of malignancy.

Keywords - Adrenal mass, CT, Computed Tomography, benign, malignant, pathology.

References

1.     1.      Arnold DT, Reed JB, Burt K. Evaluation and management of the incidental adrenal mass. Proc (BaylUniv Med Cent) 2003;16:7–12. 

2.      Kloos RT, Gross MD, Francis IR, Korobkin M, Shapiro B. Incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Endocr Rev 1995; 16:460 –484

3.      Aron D, Terzolo M, Cawood TJ. Adrenal incidentalomas. Best Pract Res ClinEndocrinolMetab 2012;26:69-82.

4.      Lee MJ, Hahn PF, Papanicolaou N, et al. Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and interobserver analysis. Radiology 1991;179(2):415–418

5.      Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR. Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171 (1):201–204

6.      Wajchenberg BL,lbergaria Pereira MA, Medonca BB, et al.. Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical and laboratory observations. Cancer 2000;88(4):711–736.

7.      Berland, Lincoln L., et al. Differentiation between small benign and malignant adrenal masses with dynamic incremented CT.  American Journal of Roentgenology 151.1 (1988): 95-101

8.      Chiche L,  Dousset, B., Kieffer, E., &Chapuis, Y, Laurent, Adrenocortical carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava: presentation of a 15-patient series and review of the literature. Surgery 139.1 (2006): 15-27

9.      Ctvrtlík F,Herman M,Student V,Tichá V,Minarík J. Differential diagnosis diagnosis of incidentally detected adrenal masses revealed on routine abdominal CT. Eur J Radiol 2009;69(2):243–252

10.  Mayo-Smith, William W., Giles W. Boland, Richard B. Noto, and Michael J. Lee. State-of-the-Art Adrenal Imaging 1. Radiographics 21, no. 4 (2001): 995-1012.

11.  Commons RR, Callaway CP. Adenomas of the adrenal cortex.Archiv Intern Med 1948;81:37–41

12.  Bilimoria KY, Shen WT, Elaraj D, et al.: Adrenocortical carcinoma in the United States: treatment utilization and prognostic factors. Cancer 113 (11): 3130-6, 2008. 

13.  Adams JE, Johnson AJ, Aickards D, Isherwood I. Computed tomography in adrenal disease. Clin Radio! 1983;34:39-49

14.  Moss AA, Gamsu G, Genant HK, eds. Computed tomography of the body. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1983;860-872 .

15.  Eghrani M, McLoughlin MJ, Rosen IE, et al. The role of computed tomography in assessment of tumoralpathology of the adrenal glands. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1980;4:71-77.

Corresponding Author

Usha Kumari Kunjuraman

Assistant Professor, Dept of Radiodiagnosis

Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.