Title: A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Open Appendicectomy

Authors: Dr B.S Ramesh, Dr Sharanappa Beragi

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i3.92

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: Comparative study between laparoscopic appendicectomy and open appendicectomy in terms of safety and benefits with respect to duration of operation, post-operative pain, resumption of oral diet, duration of hospital stay, incidence of complications and cost.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from 120 consecutive patients between October 2014 and September 2016 with acute and recurrent appendicitis were studied. These comprised of 60 patients who underwent conventional appendicectomy and 60 patients treated laparoscopically. The two groups were compared with respect to duration of operation, post-operative pain, resumption of oral diet, duration of hospital stay, incidence of complications and cost.

Results: Most patients presented in second-third decade of life. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (3.22 Vs5.87 days, P=0.001),longer operating time (70.83±18.28 vs 52.00min, P<0.001),less Post operative pain scores (0.47 vs. 0.73; P < 0.001)at discharge, early resumption of normal diet. Post  operative complications  were  equal  in  both  groups. The  total  cost  of  hospital  stay  was not significantly higher in laparoscopic appendicectomy than open appendicectomy group (11944.78 ±12170.85 Vs 11149.90±1988.76 INR, p<0.619) respectively. There was no mortality in either group.

Conclusion: Overall, laparoscopic appendicectomy is better than open appendicectomy in selected patients with acute or recurrent appendicitis.

Keywords: Laparoscopic appendicectomy, open appendicectomy, conventional appendicectomy, Acute appendicitis.

References

1.      Bailey & Love’s Short Practice of Surgery 26th Edition..,1199-1200.

2.      Telfor G, Wallace J, “Appendix” chapter 13 in Oxford text book of surgery, Morris PJ., Wood WC., Eds. Vol.2, 2nd Edn, Oxford Medical Publications, 2000; 180-189.

3.      Palanivelu C, Laparoscopic Appende-ctomy, Chapter 58 in Art of Laparoscopi-csurgery, textbook and atlas vol.1,Jaypee Publications, 2007;943-970 .

4.      Michael JZ, Stanley WA, Douglas SS, David IS. Appendix and appendectomy. Maingot‟s abdominal operations. 11th edition. 2007;21:589-608.

5.      Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;219:725-8.

6.      Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15:5964.

7.      Schreiber JH. Early experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in women. SurgEndosc 1987;1:2116.

8.      Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appende-ctomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:250-6.

9.      Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. SurgLaparoscEndosc. 1999;9:17-26.

10.  Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparo-scopic versus open appendectomy: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545-3.

11.  Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001546.

12.  Slim K, Pezet D, Chipponi J. Laparoscopic or open appendectomy ?critical review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:398-403.

13.  Tate JJT, Chung SCS, Dawson J, Leong HT, Chan A, Lau WY, et al, “Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis” Br J Surg. June 1993;80:761-762.

14.  Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M, Choice of approach for appendicectomy: A metaanalysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:245-255.

15.  Frazee RC, Robert JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder K, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, et al. “A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy.” Ann Surg. 1994; 219:725-731.

16.  Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swantrom LL, Schirmer B, “A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendicectomy with open appendic-ectomy.” Am J Surg. 1995;169:208-273.

17.  Chung RS, Rowland Dy, Paul Li, Diaz J, Clevelan, Ohio, “A meta analysis of Ran-domized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy,” Am J Surg,1999;177:250-256.

18.  Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronnjng H, Qvist N and Laurberg S, “Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy” Br J Surg.2001;88:200-205.

19.  Josloff RK, Zucker KA. Laparoscopic appendicectomy, Chapter 19, in SurgicalLaparoscopy, Zucker KA, Eds., 2nd Edn, Lippincott Williams and Wilkinspublications 2001; 229-235.

20.  Seeney KJ, Keane FBV, “Moving from open to laparoscopic appendicectomy” Br J Surg.2003;90:257-258.

21.  Nguyen N, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S. Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, et al. Trends inutilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Am J Surg2004; 188(6): 813-820.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sharanappa Beragi

Address: #5, GPK14-4-116, Radhakrisna Colony,

Kuknoor, TQ; Yelburga Dist; Koppal, 583232

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Mobile no-9591440888