Title: TEP versus TAPP Repair for Inguinal Hernia- A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Centre (IGMC Shimla)

Authors: Dr VK Sharma, Dr U K Chandel, Dr Dinesh Thakur, Dr KJS Jaswal, Dr RS Jhobta

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i1.74

Abstract

This study was conducted in Department of Surgery w.e.f. June 2013 to May 2014. The purpose of our study was to compare two laparoscopic procedures for inguinal hernia repair in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay and postoperative complications .A total of 40 patients were subjected to surgery allocating to TAPP or TEP group alternatively, thus each group having 20 patients . It was observed that operative time was little more in TEP group as compared with TAPP. Operative time ranged between 50-130 minutes (mean 78.25 minutes)   in TEP group and 40-70 minutes (mean 58 minutes) in TAPP group. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain, need for analgesia, hospital stay and return to work. (P value> 0.05) There was no major postoperative complications in either group. Minor complications like, seroma was observed in 2cases(10%), Pneumoscrotum in 3 cases (15%) and UTI in 1 case(5%) in TEP group while in TAPP group  haematoma in 3 cases(15%) and scrotal edema  in 3 cases(15%) were observed. There were no recurrance in either group over a follow up period of 6-12 months. It was observed in the present study that  both procedures are equally effective in hernia repair, but TEP  takes  more time as space is limited, hence we conclude that TAPP repair of  inguinal hernia is easier and equally effective. 

References

1.      SSS McClusky DA, Mirilas P, Zoras O, Skandalakis PN,Skandalakis JE. Groin hernia: anatomical and surgical history. Arch Surg 2006; 141:1035–42.

2.      Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, et al. Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:518 –522.

3.      Beet GL, Dirksen CD, Go PMNYH et al. Open or laparoscopic mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc.1999;13:323–327

4.      Ferzli G, Masaad A, Albert P et al. (1993) Endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy versus conventional hernia repair. A comparative study. Curr Surg 50:291–294

5.      [Felix EL, Michas CA, Gonzalez MH. Laparoscopic hernioplasty : TAPP vs TEP. Surg Endosc 1995;9:984-9

6.      McKernan JB, Laws HL.Laparoscopic repair of inguinal herniasusing a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach. Surg Endosc1993;7:26-8

7.      Rulkow I: The recurrence rate in hernia surgery. Arch Surg 130:575-8,1995.

8.      Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM: The pathophysiology of recurrent hernia. A new concept introducing the tension-free repair. Contemp Surg 35:13-9, 1989

9.      Mameren H, Go MNYH: Surgical anatomy of the interior inguinal region. Surg Endosc 8:1212-1215, 1994

10.  Khoury N: A comparative study of lapar-oscopic extraperitoneal and transabdo-minal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. J laparoendosc Surg 5:349-355, 1995.

11.  Felix EL, Michas CA, Gonzalez MH. Laparoscopic hernioplasty :TAPP vs TEP . Surg Endosc 1995;9:984-9.

12.  Schultz L, Cartuill J, Graber JN, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal procedure. Semin Laparosc Surg 1994; 1:98-105.

13.  Kald A, Anderberg B, Smedh K and Karllsson M. Trans peritonealor totally extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic hernia repair: Results of 491 consecutive herniorrrhaphies. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1997; 7:80-89.

14.  Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Duncan TD, et al. Technical consideration of the different approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy; an analysis of 500 cases. An Surg. 1996; 62; 69-72.

15.  Topal B. and Hourlay P. Totally pre peritoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 61-3.

16.  Halkik N, Ksontini R, Corpataus JM, Beslin MB. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with extra peritoneal double mesh technique. J Laparosc Adv Surg Tech. 1999; 9: 492-4.

17.  Liem MSL, Graaf YD, Steensel CV et.al. Comparision ofconventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair N Eng J Med. 1997; 336; 1541-47.

18.  Champault GG, Rizk N, Catheline JM, et al. Inguinal hernia repair, totally preperitoneal laparoscopic approach vs stoppa operation: Randomized trial of 100 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997; 7 (6):

19.  Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R and Wayand W. Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after trans abdominal preperitoneal, total preperito-nieal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Sur. 1996; 83: 1563-6.

20.  Spitz DJ and Arrequi ME. Sutureless laparoscopic Extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy using reusable instruments. Surg Laprosc Endosc,1999;10:24-9

21.  Cohen RV, Alvarez G, Roll S, et al. Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair? Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1998; 8: 264-8.

22.  Van Hee R, Goverde p, Hendrickx L,Van der Schelling G, Totte E. Laparoscopic transperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective clinical trial. Acta Chir Belg 1998;98:132-135.

23.. Gass M1, Banz VM, Rosella L, Adamina M, Candinas D, Güller U. TAPP or TEP? Population-based analysis of prospective data on 4,552 patients undergoing endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 2012 Dec;36(12):2782-6.

Corresponding Author

Dr U K Chandel

Prof, Surgery IGMC SHIMLA