Title: Nutritional Status-Related Factors Contribute to Poor Glycemic Status in a Sample of Iraqi Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Authors: Ali K Al-Hasnawi, Barakatun Nisak MY, AS Hazizi, Al-Razzouqi Rafi

 DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v3i8.51

DIDS : 08.2015-XXXXXXX

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is now posing the largest disease threat to Iraq’s health care services with majority of our patients were reported to have poor glycemic status. Role of nutrition therapy is important, however their nutritional status is not fully being addressed. Therefore, this study aimed to determine nutritional status-related factors and its contribution to glycemic status in a sample of Iraqi patients with Type 2 DM.

Methodology: A total of 170 diabetics (91 males, 79 females) aged 20 years and above (Mean + SD = 51.2 ± 10.2 years) from a selected Diabetic Centre in Teaching hospital in Iraq were recruited. Nutritional status characteristics which include anthropometric, biochemical, clinical and dietary intake data including dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) were collected. Glycemic status was assessed using HbA1c level. Medical characteristic and other lifestyle behaviours including smoking status and physical activity level were also obtained.

Results: Subjects participated in the study were diagnosed with Type 2 DM between 5 and 10 years. Their mean HbA1c was 10.4 ± 1.6% with only 0.6% achieved the target treatment goal of HbA1c < 7%. Their mean BMI was 29.6 ± 4.0 kg/m2 with 89% of the subjects were either overweight or obese. Average energy intake of the subjects was 2032.7 ± 274.6 kcal/day with the proportion of macronutrients were in line with the professional bodies’ recommendation. Dietary GI and GL of the subjects were 59.7 ± 3.8 and 21.8 ± 3.8 respectively which generally higher as compared to the other Middle East studies. There were seven factors namely; Subjects who were on diet alone (Beta=0.25, t = 3.949, p=0.0001); LDL level ( Beta=-0.331, t = 5.388, p = 0.0001);  Dietary GL ( Beta = 0.162 , t = 2.714, p = 0.007);  physical activity level ( Beta = -0.241 , t = -3.580, p = 0.0001);  BMI  ( Beta = 0.214 , t= 3.395, p = 0.001); Subjects who were on Sulfonylurea (Beta=-0.167, t = -2.615, p=0.01); total fiber (Beta = 0.133, t = -2.169, p = 0.032); were found to be the predictors which explained  45% of the variation (R2 = 0.45) in glycemic status.

Conclusions: Poor glycemic status, overweight and obesity were highly prevalent in a sample of Iraqi patients with type 2 DM. Subjects who were on diet alone, high LDL level, high dietary GL intake, lack of physical activity, high BMI, subjects who were not on Sulfonylurea drug and had high total fibre were the factors contributed to poor glycemic status. Future studies should consider incorporating these components into the framework of nutrition-related intervention to Iraqi type 2 DM.

Key words: Nutritional status, Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Iraqi Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

References

1.      Barakatun Nisak, Talib, R., Kamaruddin, N., Karim, N., Chinna, K., & Gilbertson, H. (2009). A lowGI diet is associated with a shortterm improvement of glycaemic control in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 11(4), 387-396.

2.      Mendosa, D. (2008). Revised International Table of Glycemic Index (GI) and Glycemic Load (GL) Values—2008. Living With Diabetes.Nadine, T. (2010). Prevalence and determinants of albuminuria in a cohort of diabetic patients in Lebanon.

3.      WHO. (1995). Physical status: The use of and interpretation of anthropometry, Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

4.      Wolever, T. M., Yang, M., Zeng, X. Y., Atkinson, F., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2006). Food glycemic index, as given in glycemic index tables, is a significant determinant of glycemic responses elicited by composite breakfast meals. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 83(6), 1306-1312.

5.      Esposito, K., Maiorino, M. I., Di Palo, C., & Giugliano, D. (2010). Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load are associated with metabolic control in type 2 diabetes: The CAPRI experience. Metabolic syndrome and related disorders, 8(3), 255-261.

6.      Malaysia, M.o.H., clinical practice guidelines:management of type 2 Diabetes mellitus. 2009. 4th edition.

7.      Ismail, I.S., et al., Ethnicity and glycaemic control are major determinants of diabetic dyslipidaemia in Malaysia. Diabetic Medicine, 2001. 18(6): p. 501-508.

8.      M, W., M. A, and L. CMYE, levated totalcholesterol: its prevalence and population attributable frac-tion for mortality from coronary heart disease and ischaem-ic stroke in the Asia-Pacific region. Eur J Cardiovas Prevand Rehabil 2008(15): p. 397-401.

9.      Type, A.-P., Diabetes Policy Group. Type 2 diabetes practical targets and treatments. Health Communications Austrilia, 2005.

10.  Leiter, L. A., Betteridge, D. J., Chacra, A. R., Chait, A., Ferrannini, E., Haffner, S. M., . . . Newman, C. B. (2006). AUDIT study. Evidence of global undertreatment of dyslipidaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, 6(1), 31-40.

11.  Association, A. D. (2015). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetesd 2015

12.  Khattab, M., Khader, Y. S., Al-Khawaldeh, A., & Ajlouni, K. (2010). Factors associated with poor glycemic status among patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of diabetes and its complications, 24(2), 84-89.

13.  Mansour, A. A. (2008). Patients' opinion on the barriers to diabetes control in areas of conflicts: The Iraqi example. Conflict and health, 2(1), 7.

14.  Mansour, A. A. (2009). chronic complications of Diabetes in Iraq: experience  from southern Iraq

15.  Saadi, H., Carruthers, S. G., Nagelkerke, N., Al-Maskari, F., Afandi, B., Reed, R., . . . Algawi, K. (2007). Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its complications in a population-based sample in Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Diabetes research and clinical practice, 78(3), 369-377.

16.  Marzouqi, M. H. M. A., Burke, D. S., & Ghazali, D. M. R. A. ( 2014). A Photographic Atlas of Food Portions for the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Abu Dhabi Food Control Authority.

17.  Eid, M., Mafauzy, M., & Faridah, A. (2003). Glycaemic control of type 2 diabetic patients on follow up at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 10(2), 40.

18.  Horikawa, C., Yoshimura, Y., Kamada, C., Tanaka, S., Tanaka, S., Takahashi, A., . . . Tanaka, A. (2014). Dietary intake in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Analysis from Japan Diabetes Complications Study. Journal of diabetes investigation, 5(2), 176-187.

19.  Schulz, M., Liese, A. D., Mayer-Davis, E. J., D'Agostino, R. B., Fang, F., Sparks, K. C., & Wolever, T. M. (2005). Nutritional correlates of dietary glycaemic index: new aspects from a population perspective. British Journal Of Nutrition, 94(03), 397-406.

20.  Joudah, M. M., Al-Kaseer, E. A., Al-Diwan, J. K., & Al-Hadithi, T. S. (2012). Barriers for metabolic control among type 2 diabetic patients in an area of co nflicts: Iraq 3rd International Conf erence f or Medical Sciences Proceeding Book (Vol. 1).

21.  Maryam S Farvid1, F. H., M Shokoohi1, A Fallah1 and Monir S Farvid3. (2014). Glycemic index, glycemic load and their association with glycemic status among patients with type 2 diabetes

Corresponding Author

Dr Barakatun-Nisak Mohd Yusof

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,

Universiti Putra Malaysia  43400 Serdang Selangor Fax: +603-89426769.

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..my