Details
Category: Volume 3 Issue 12 December 2015
Hits: 1486

Title: Comparison of Conventional Hang-Back and Conventional Recession Surgery for Horizontal Strabismus

Author: Amit Chopra

 DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v3i12.12

Abstract

Introduction: Strabismus means ocular misalignment, whether caused by abnormalities in binocular vision or by anomalies of neuromuscular control of ocular motility. A successful strabismus surgery should balance muscle forces to restore central or peripheral fusion when possible or acceptable cosmesis when fusion cannot be accepted. Weakening procedure on rectii constitute an important surgical modality for correcting various forms of strabismus.

Material and Methods: Study was performed in 2006-2007 on thirty patients of comitant horizontal strabismus who had undergone surgical correction for deviation in Deptt. of Ophthalmology, GGS Medical College, Faridkot. After preliminary ocular examination which included anterior segment & fundus examination, angle of deviation was measured by prism bar cover test followed by squint surgery. 15 patients had undergone conventional recession and rest of 15 patients had undergone hang-back recession surgery. Follow up was done at 1 week, 1 month & 3 months post op.  

Results: It was observed that at third month postop 86.66% of patients with conventional recession achieve deviation less than 10 PD with respect to 80% of patients with hang-back recession.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the success rate in relation to angle of deviation for both types of surgical techniques. The results of this study suggested that conventional hang-back recession surgery is a predictable alternative to conventional recession surgery.

Keywords: Horizontal strabismus, conventional recession , hang-back recession.

References

  1. Jampolsky A. Current techniques of adjustable strabismus surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1979;88:406-18.
  2. Rosenbaum AL , Metz HS, Carlson M, Jampolsky A. Adjustable rectus muscle recession surgery : A follow up study. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:817-20.
  3. Macleod JD, Rhatigan MC, Luff AJ, Morris RJ. Bimedial rectus recession using the anchored hang-back technique. Ophthalmiv Surg Lasers 1997 Apr; 28(4):343-46.
  4. Scott WE, Keech R, MashAJ. The postoperative results and stability of exodeviations. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:1814-18.
  5. Lennerstrand G. Adjustable sutures in strabismus surgery: a follow up study. Acta Ophthalmologica 1982;60:717-28.
  6. Wise J , Flanders M , Williams F, Beneish R. Adjustable sutures in strabismus surgery. Canadian J Ophthalmol 1982;17:157-60.
  7. Keech RV, Scott WE, Christensen LE. Adjustable sutures strabismus surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1987;24: 97-102.
  8. Repka MX, Guyton DL. Comparison of hang-back medial rectus recession with conventional recession. Ophthalmology 1988 June; 95(6):782-87.
  9. Capo H, Repka MX, Guyton DL. Hang-back lateral rectus recession for exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1989 Jan-Feb;26(1):31-33.
  10. Wright KW. Practical aspect of adjustable suture technique for strabismus surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clinic 1989 ;29(1):10-15.
  11. Franklin SR, Hiatt RL. Adjustable sutures in strabismus surgery. Ann Ophthalmol 1989;21:285-89.
  12. Gobin MH. Recession of medial rectus muscle with a loop.Ophthalmologica 1968;156:25-27.
  13. Rajavi Z, Ghadim HM, Nikkhoo M, Dehsarvi B. Comparison of hang-back and conventional recession surgery for horizontal strabismus. J pediatr ophthalmol strabismus 2001 Sep-Oct;38(5):273-77.

Corresponding Author

Amit Chopra

Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology,

MM Medical College, Kumarhatti, Solan

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.