Title: A Comparative Study of Effect of High Intensity Interval Training and Slow Continuous Training on the Aerobic performance in Adult Healthy Untrained Male Volunteers

Authors: Dr Vivekanand Upadhyay, Dr J S Sandhu

 DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i1.01

Abstract

Introduction: Endurance is a key requirement for overall physical fitness and most other organised sports. Coaches have different favourite methods to train for endurance, and jury is divided on which is the best of them.

Aim: This study aims to compare the effects of two popular methods of endurance training, High Intensity Interval Training and Slow Continuous Training.

Hypothesis: High Intensity Interval Training provides better gain in endurance than Slow Continuous Training in untrained adult male over a six week training protocol.

Methods:  During the period 2010 – 2013, 238 young adult healthy male volunteers were randomly divided into HIIT and SCT groups. Both groups were provided supervised training as per protocol given below. Each session additionally incorporated warm up and cool down.

HIIT: 03 sessions/ week for 06 weeks at velocity equal to maximum velocity achieved in pre experiment beep test, with Training/Active rest in ratio of 1:1 (30s/30s), 05 reps per set, 04 sets per session with 03 min rest between sets

SCT: 05 sessions of 30 min each per week for 06 weeks, at velocity equal to 60 – 70% of maximum velocity achieved in pre experiment beep test

Endurance using beep test was measured just before administering the experimental protocols, at 3 weeks interval and upon conclusion of study at 6 weeks. VO2max was calculated using VO2max calculator provided at the official website http://www.thebeeptest.com/calculator.htm. The results were compared for statistical significance.

Results: Mean pre test VO2max levels of both HIIT and SCT were comparable (34.29mL/kg vs 37.12mL/kg). After three weeks of training, HIIT group showed higher enhancement in VO2max (13.87% vs 8.76%) than SCT group. After six weeks of training, HIIT group continued to have higher gain in VO2max (20.75% vs 15.19%) than SCT group. The study shows that High Intensity Interval Training provides superior gain in endurance than Slow Continuous Training.

Conclusion: High Intensity Interval Training provides superior gain in aerobic capacity than Slow Continuous Training over 6 weeks of training using lesser training time.

Keywords: High Intensity Interval Training, Slow Continous Training, Endurance, HIIT, SCT, Aerobic Performance, VO2max

References

1.   Carl D Paton, Will G Hopkins. Effects of high intensity training on Performance and Physiology of Endurance Atheletes. Sportscience 2004;8:25-40.

2.      Stephen Seiler, Espen Tonnessen. Intervals, Thresholds and Long Slow distance:the role of Intensity and Duration in Endurance training. Sportscience. 2009; 13:32-53.

3.      www.humankinetics/com/textbook of work physiology-4th edition/Astrend and Rodahl,1986

4.      Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, Karlsen T, Berg P, Bjerkaas M, Simonsen T, HelgesenC, Hjorth N, Bach R, Hoff J. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Apr;39(4):665-71.

5.      Driller MW, Fell JW, Gregory JR, Shing CM, Williams AD. The effects of high-intensity interval training in well-trained rowers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2009 Mar;4(1):110-21.

6.      Tanisho K, Hirakawa K  Training effects on endurance capacity in maximal intermittent exercise: comparison between continuous and interval training. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Nov;23(8):2405-10

7.      Nybo L, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Mohr M, Hornstrup T, Simonsen L, Bülow J, Randers MB, Nielsen JJ, Aagaard P, Krustrup P. High-intensity training versus traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Oct;42(10):1951-8.

8.      Sperlich B, Zinner C, Heilemann I, Kjendlie PL, Holmberg HC, Mester J. High-intensity interval training improves VO(2peak), maximal lactate accumulation, time trial and competition performance in 9-11-year-old swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Nov;110(5):1029-36. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

9.      Sperlich B, De Marées M, Koehler K, Linville J, Holmberg HC, Mester J. Effects of 5 weeks of high-intensity interval training vs. volume training in 14-year-old soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1271-8.

10.  Astorino TA, Allen RP, Roberson DW, Jurancich M, Lewis R, McCarthy K, Trost E. Adaptations to high-intensity training are independent of gender. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Jul;111(7):1279-86. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

11.  Gosselin LE, Kozlowski KF, Devinney-Boymel L, Hambridge C. Metabolic Response of Different High Intensity Aerobic Interval Exercise Protocols. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Nov 23. [Epub ahead of print]

12.  Little JP, Safdar A, Wilkin GP, Tarnopolsky MA, Gibala MJ. A practical model of low-volume high-intensity interval training induces mitochondrial biogenesis in human skeletal muscle: potential mechanisms. J Physiol. 2010 Mar 15;588(Pt 6):1011-22. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Corresponding Author

Dr Vivekanand Upadhyay

Sports Medicine Specialist, Dept of Sports Medicine and Physiotherapy

Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar PIN - 143005

Email - This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Mob- +91 7030502200